The study seeks to examine if the lesson plan in the treatment group is a more efficacious way of teaching the Toulmin model of argumentation (DV1; measured via a quiz on knowledge and application of the Toulmin model) compared to the control. Additionally, we wanted to measure students' need for cognition (DV2; though we don't expect this to change from pre to post), self-assessment of critical thinking (DV3), and argumentativeness (DV4).

The research design is as follows:

Both the treatment and control groups took a pretest with measures of the aforementioned DVs. The control group was then taught the standard Toulmin lesson plan; while the experimental group was taught a different lesson specifically designed for the study. The pre- and posttests were paired, with the same participants completing both tests in each group.

I know I can Select Cases for the control, for example, then do a paired samples t-test to see if there was a statistically significant difference between the pre and post test. However, I'm not sure to compare the control and experimental groups to see if there was a statistically significant difference between the pre- and posttest across the two groups.

Thank you and please let me know if you need any more information.

More Nate S. Brophy's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions