Well I agree with the last aphorism of Wittgenstein's Tractatus (Wittgenstein a misunderstood genius), but I agree also with the open Metaphysics inaugurated by Husserl and completly based on perception: the IMMER WIEDER Metaphysics.The Wittgenstein's statement is right for all metaphysics based on logic thought. What do you think Dear Buhara about new Metaphysics i. e. The Science? The Science founded on Normal Science Paradigm has replaced old Metaphysics based on Theology and aristotelian thinking...
Sry my Tricky answer Dr. Nani. "About new Metaphysics i. e. The Science" seems very provocative for many scientisit. Resurrection of Teology and Aristotatle essentiallism is true observation. Lacking of terminology, not enough lectrures on science faculties (almost nothing) is a big problem. Therefore there is no correct place for discussion on metaphysics. It might be science if you accept a topic as an axiom, logically yo deduce other related statements. But how can we differentiate from scientific ones from non-scientific ones? Thats why you ask for the answer...
I think many scientists take Science as a "fact". It is Ingenuous Realism. It is difficult to meet scientists really aware of the processes that take place in consciousness when they think in a scientific way. I am asking for more Epistemological consciousness...
I think the happenings in the state of hypnosis fall in the question of what is metaphysics, though for Aristotle [ ΜΕΤΑ ΤΑ ΦΥΣΙΚΑ] this was his work following the Physics.
Metaphysics is the philosophical approach to identify, understand, and know My Self. Alas, metaphysics can never arrive at the destination it seeks. Only the complete and consistent theory could do that.
Pain is real because we can feel it but have no shape or material. We have known the substances regarding the pain but it is not material of the pain. Also we have analgesics to remove the pain but pain still mystery. In term of metaphysics, we called pain is metaphysics. may be ?? ?