What I understand so far is that the summary summarizes the work as well as the presentation of the research gap, and provides a perception of the sample, tools, and results.

The conclusion provides a perception of the problem, the contribution of the current study to closing the research gap, and then highlighting the results and limits. Then in a separate address, recommendations are displayed for future research, sometimes also borders in a separate address. which determines this university guide.

Can someone best explain what they should (and shouldn't) include in the abstract? Similarly in conclusion.

Many thanks.

More Maha A. Alameri's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions