In the context of multiphase flows, "sharp" and "diffused" interfaces refer to how the boundary between two phases (e.g., liquid and gas) is represented in numerical models.

1. Sharp Interface Models:

In sharp interface models, the interface between the two phases is represented as a well-defined boundary, with a discontinuity in properties like density or velocity at the interface. This approach directly captures the location of the interface and the flow behavior on both sides.

The main challenge with sharp interface models is the difficulty in capturing complex interface dynamics (like surface tension or instability) without introducing computational costs or inaccuracies due to the sharp transition between phases.

Methods that use sharp interfaces include:

- Level Set (LS) Method: The level set method represents the interface as a level set of a scalar function (typically, the signed distance function). It tracks the evolution of the interface implicitly through the evolution of this function. It is accurate in capturing the interface but requires remeshing to prevent distortion of the interface representation over time.

- Volume of Fluid (VOF): The VOF method tracks the fraction of fluid volume within each computational cell. The interface is not explicitly defined but can be reconstructed from the volume fraction distribution. It’s widely used for capturing sharp interfaces in free-surface flows.

Characteristics of sharp interface models:

- Clear delineation between phases.

- Computationally more demanding when resolving interface evolution, especially for complex geometries.

- Can handle interface phenomena (like surface tension) more directly.

2. Diffused Interface Models:

In diffused interface models, the interface between the two phases is smeared over a finite region, rather than being sharp. Instead of modeling a clear boundary between the phases, these models use continuous fields (e.g., a phase field or order parameter) that gradually transition between phases. The interface is typically a region where properties (e.g., concentration, density, velocity) change smoothly over a small but finite region.

Diffused interface models are generally easier to implement and can handle complex flow dynamics, but they may not provide as clear a definition of the interface and might require additional techniques to capture phenomena like surface tension.

Methods that use diffused interfaces include:

- Phase Field Method: This method introduces a smooth, continuous order parameter (often denoted as \( \phi \)), which varies between the two phases. The phase transition is gradual, and the interface is represented as a transition zone rather than a sharp boundary. This approach is especially useful in modeling phase transitions, such as melting or solidification, but is computationally more expensive due to the need to resolve the entire transition zone.

- Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM): While LBM is a kinetic approach and not specifically designed for multiphase flows, it can incorporate diffused interface models using techniques like the Shan-Chen model. The interface in this case is diffused across neighboring grid cells. LBM is known for its flexibility and ability to simulate complex fluid dynamics but might struggle with capturing sharp interfaces without additional modeling techniques.

Characteristics of diffused interface models:

- Simpler to implement.

- Better suited for modeling complex topological changes (like merging or breakup of phases).

- Less accurate in capturing the precise interface position.

3. Comparison of Methods:

- Phase Field Method: Diffused interface. It is a powerful method for handling complex multiphase flow problems, especially where phase transitions (e.g., solidification or boiling) are involved, but it’s computationally expensive due to the need to resolve the entire interface region.

- Level Set Method: Sharp interface. It provides a clear, sharp representation of the interface, making it ideal for problems where accurate tracking of the interface position is crucial. It can be combined with reinitialization methods to maintain the accuracy of the distance function over time.

- VOF (Volume of Fluid): Sharp interface. The VOF method is also used to track interfaces in multiphase flows, with a clear distinction between the phases. It can reconstruct the interface location based on the volume fraction field but may struggle with capturing surface tension effects without modifications.

- CLSVOF (Coupled Level Set and VOF): Combines sharp interface and diffused interface methods. It uses the advantages of both the Level Set and VOF methods to provide a robust way to track the interface and handle the complexities of multiphase flows. It’s often used when high fidelity in interface tracking is required, along with better handling of topological changes.

4. Which Method Should Be Preferred?

The choice between sharp and diffused interface models depends on the specific application and the type of problem you're trying to solve:

- For simulations requiring high accuracy in interface tracking (such as fluid dynamics with surface tension or breakup/coalescence of drops), sharp interface models (like Level Set, VOF, or CLSVOF) are usually preferred because they provide a clear boundary for the interface.

- For problems involving complex multiphase flows, such as in cases where phase transitions or diffusion are involved (e.g., in the modeling of thin films, bubbles, or droplet dynamics), diffused interface models like the Phase Field Method might be better suited, as they can handle more complex, evolving interfaces without needing explicit tracking.

- LBM is often preferred for its ease of implementation, particularly in systems where mesoscopic methods are more appropriate, but it requires modifications (e.g., the Shan-Chen model) to capture sharp interfaces accurately.

5. References:

- Sussman, M., & Smereka, P. (2000). "A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow." Journal of Computational Physics.

- Tryggvason, G., Scardovelli, R., & Zaleski, S. (2011). Direct Numerical Simulations of Gas-Liquid Multiphase Flows. Cambridge University Press.

- Anderson, D., McFadden, G., & Wheeler, A. (1998). "Diffuse-interface methods in fluid mechanics." Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics

Took help from my professor. Dr.Pandya

In the context of **multiphase flows**, the terms *sharp interface model* and *diffuse interface model* describe how the boundary (interface) between different phases (e.g., liquid and gas) is treated in numerical simulations. Here's a detailed explanation of these models and where some well-known methods fit:

---

### **1. Sharp Interface Model**

- **Definition**: In sharp interface models, the interface between phases is treated as a zero-thickness boundary. The properties (e.g., density, viscosity) exhibit a discontinuous change across this interface.

- **Characteristics**:

- The interface is explicitly tracked or captured.

- Surface tension and interface physics are modeled explicitly.

- Methods aim to keep the interface sharp throughout the simulation.

- **Examples of Methods**:

1. **Level Set (LS)**:

- The interface is represented as the zero level of a signed distance function.

- LS is classified as a *sharp interface method* because it tracks the interface as a mathematical contour.

- However, numerical diffusion can cause smearing, requiring reinitialization to maintain sharpness.

2. **Volume of Fluid (VOF)**:

- Tracks the volume fraction of one phase in computational cells.

- A reconstruction step is used to define the sharp interface.

3. **Coupled Level Set and Volume of Fluid (CLSVOF)**:

- Combines the level set's geometric accuracy with VOF's volume conservation.

- Primarily used as a sharp interface method but may exhibit minor smearing due to numerical diffusion.

4. **Front Tracking**:

- Tracks the interface explicitly using Lagrangian markers on a computational grid.

- Strictly sharp by definition.

---

### **2. Diffuse Interface Model**

- **Definition**: In diffuse interface models, the interface has a finite thickness, across which properties transition smoothly. These models often rely on solving partial differential equations for phase fields or order parameters that vary continuously.

- **Characteristics**:

- No explicit tracking of the interface is needed; it is embedded in the solution.

- Interface physics (e.g., surface tension) is naturally incorporated into the formulation.

- Commonly used with thermodynamically consistent models.

- **Examples of Methods**:

1. **Phase Field Method**:

- Uses a continuous phase field variable to represent phases, with transitions occurring over a finite interface width.

- Classified as a diffuse interface method.

2. **Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM)**:

- Often formulated as a diffuse interface model, especially for multiphase simulations.

- Interfaces emerge naturally as regions of smooth transitions based on distribution functions.

3. **Cahn-Hilliard or Allen-Cahn Models**:

- Solve phase field equations for interface dynamics and are inherently diffuse.

---

### **Comparison of Sharp vs. Diffuse Interface Models**

| **Aspect** | **Sharp Interface Model** | **Diffuse Interface Model** |

|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|

| **Interface Thickness** | Zero | Finite |

| **Numerical Complexity** | Requires explicit tracking/reconstruction | Interface dynamics emerge naturally |

| **Physical Consistency** | Requires explicit addition of terms for physics like surface tension | Surface tension included naturally via energy minimization |

| **Computational Cost** | Higher due to reconstruction | Can be lower, but diffuse models require fine resolution for sharp interfaces |

| **Accuracy for Thin Films/Small Scales** | May struggle without high resolution | Better for nanoscale dynamics |

---

### **Which Method to Prefer and Why?**

The choice depends on your application and computational resources:

1. **Sharp Interface Methods** (e.g., LS, VOF, CLSVOF):

- **Best For**: Engineering applications where high accuracy in interface location and mass conservation is crucial (e.g., bubble dynamics, droplet impact).

- **Advantages**:

- Precise interface tracking.

- Suitable for problems with large density/viscosity contrasts.

- **Challenges**:

- Interface reconstruction can be computationally expensive.

- Sensitive to numerical errors.

2. **Diffuse Interface Methods** (e.g., Phase Field, LBM):

- **Best For**: Problems where thermodynamics or phase transition is important (e.g., spinodal decomposition, microfluidics).

- **Advantages**:

- No explicit interface tracking needed.

- Captures complex interface dynamics naturally.

- **Challenges**:

- Requires careful tuning of parameters (e.g., interface thickness, mobility).

- High resolution is needed for sharp interface approximation.

---

### **General Recommendations**

- For **macroscale flows with sharp interfaces** (e.g., free-surface flows), sharp methods like VOF or CLSVOF are preferred.

- For **mesoscale or nanoscale flows** with complex physics, diffuse methods like Phase Field or LBM are often more appropriate.

- When combining the advantages of both, hybrid approaches (e.g., CLSVOF or coupling Phase Field with sharp models) can provide a good balance.

Would you like more details on any specific method or comparison?

In the context of multiphase flows, the terms sharp interface model and diffused interface model refer to how the interface between two immiscible phases (e.g., liquid and gas) is represented.

Sharp Interface Model

• In this model, the interface is treated as a discontinuity with negligible or no thickness.
• The fluid properties (e.g., density, viscosity) change abruptly across the interface, and the interfacial dynamics (e.g., surface tension) are explicitly computed at the interface.

Famous Methods in this Category:

Diffused Interface Model

• Here, the interface is represented as a continuous transition region where fluid properties vary smoothly over a finite thickness.
• The interface dynamics are modeled by additional equations, often involving a phase field variable.

Famous Methods in this Category:

Which Should Be Preferred and Why?

The choice depends on application requirements:

Practical Preference:

• For industrial applications requiring mass conservation and sharp interfaces (e.g., multiphase simulations in aerospace or automotive sectors), CLSVOF is often preferred.
• For flows involving interfacial instabilities or complex phenomena like emulsification, Phase-Field or LBM may be more efficient.

Choosing the best model also depends on the available computational resources and the physics of the problem being simulated.