It seems to be generally accepted that the passenger strand of microRNA (miR*) is typically much less abundant than the guide strand (presumably, due to higher degradation rates of the former). However, in the RNA-seq results we can see some fraction of microRNAs displaying the opposite distribution, i.e. much higher abundance of the passenger strand. I would be grateful if someone can point to any paper or other resource with current interpretation of this phenomenon.

My own ideas on this question include, for example, 1) Misclassification of mature strand (i.e. the more abundant strand is in fact a guide one, not passenger), 2) Guide strand has fast turnover and is quickly degraded as well.

Similar questions and discussions