Do you think AR browsers are still the best option to build AR experiences for mobile devices such as smartphones? What about the native AR applications ? Which one do you prefer and what improvement have been there in each technology?.
Take a look to the ARAF Browser https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gpac.Osmo4&hl=en
You can create content to the ARAF browser at http://www.mymultimediaworld.com/
Also take a look to Vuforia https://www.vuforia.com/
AR browsers include Layar, Wikitude, Aurasma, Junaio, Augment, Blippar and Zapar. In addition, AR SDKs are available for those with programming skills. To these; Wikitude SDK, ARcore, ARkit, Vuforia, Artoolkit 6 and so on. many examples can be given. The emergence of mixed reality in recent times and the emergence of smart goggles-for viewing AR apps- like Hololens will accelerate the development of markerless AR applications.
We very much prefer the native mobile applications, but this has proven far more difficult to create for Apple devices when compared to Android devices. The real exciting benefit of Web Browser-supported AR apps, is the potential for the single app to be completely compatible between devices.
Google is currently testing some AR apps within their Chrome browser, so it's an exciting prospect that we might see development of this increase in the future. At the moment, we use AR apps developed within Unity for our curricula.
eg:
Article Mobile Mixed Reality for Experiential Learning and Simulatio...
For those without any programming background, AR browsers is the best option for us.. As for me, i hv experience in using layar and hp reveals (aurasma)...
I've use Augment but i think that the best way to develop AR app is using natives AR application such as unity. Better quality i think and since it uses coding better security
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Asia
- India