Considering epigenetic DNA changes through environmental adaptation quickly, would a relationship between traditional DNA and epigenetic DNA reflect intelligent evolution? If there were a connection, would this not disprove Darwins theory of evolution? Does epigenetic DNA reflect mental conditioning and genetic imprinting in mammals? If so, would the relationship signify intelligent genetic evolution and adaptation through eventual means? That being said, if mutations are a negative imprint on our DNA, would positive evolutionary traits be theoretically slowly influenced by a relationship between traditional DNA and epigenetic DNA? Would that not reflect how we adapt through slow evolutionary means? If this were true, any mutagen or non-traditional influence (such as GMO's) would theoretically reflect a faulty replication, causing mutations, such as cancer cells, or changes in our biology. How else could one believe intelligent evolution, and how else would it be possible? If we as humans are merely products of our environment, would that relationship not reflect changes in our epigenetic DNA? And if the two were connected, that would disprove the "survival of the fittest" evolutionary means? Accordingly, imprinting between between mother and child would represent a change in DNA according to our environment. Considering these thoughts, would a proven relationship between epigenetic and traditional DNA be the answer for the laws of evolution? Knowing this, does the nervous system effect genetic imprinting in mammals? If an organism is proven to adapt at a much faster rate in congruence with complexity and size of genes and RNA/DNA (considering there is some sort of neurological nucleus) would epigenetic relation influence these organisms to adapt at a much faster rate, considering archean organisms evolve slowly, if not comparatively at all? All being said, how much do we truly know about evolutionary biology?