I been wondering if genes when stable transfected become regulated by the cell, or if the gene is constitutively express and translated and the protein previously made is degraded at a slower rate which allows protein accumulation. I have been wondering these since there need to reach an equilibrium in either case for the transfected gene (and the subsequent protein) and not to become toxic to the cell. I hope someone could direct me to a paper that explains this.

I ask this question because if a protein is inhibited by post-translational modification and is perpetually recycle (meaning the older protein is being ubiquitinated as new transcript are giving rise to new proteins) this means that the proteins are technically always active. However, if the transfected stable gene is regulated somehow, means that protein reaches a limit and all in time will become inhibited by this hypothetical post-translational modification. Then if the protein in question is naturally being regulated in transcription factors specifically present in certain cell lines (myeloid for example), but not in others. This could mean that the protein would not have activity in non-myeloid cells even if it's express since there is no way to activated unless other proteins that could undo the previous modification are also supplied.

I am thinking correctly, or this is just crazy talk?

Thank you, and stay safe

More Carlos A Valenzuela's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions