Scientists conceal discrepancies between the second law of thermodynamics and experiments, using sound speed measurement as an example.Scientists don't need to make themselves like mice just for the sake of the second law of thermodynamics.Below is a specific explanation.
1，According to the second law of thermodynamics, the relationship between the second VIRIAL COEFFICIENT βa of sound velocity and the second VIRIAL COEFFICIENT B of the equation of state can be obtained.
βa=2B+2*(r-1)dB/dT*T+(r-1)2/r*T2*d2B/dT2（1）
2，Scientists obtain βa，r by using resonance method to measure the speed of sound (which is relatively accurate)
3, Through formula (1), scientists obtain Bth. Normal scientists should compare Bth and Btest, but all such papers avoid this comparison.
4,Scientists used statistical mechanics to deduce the relationship between molecular interactions from Bth, and thus achieved great success. Scientists are very foolish and have never considered whether Bth is correct.
5，Scientists compare Bth and Btest privately, and if they match, they have already published it. Because it does not comply, publishing it would offend believers of the second law of thermodynamics.
6，Scientists do not need to conceal facts and boldly disclose the degree of agreement between formula (1) theory and experiment.
7，Scientists conceal discrepancies between the second law of thermodynamics and experiments, using sound speed measurement as an example.Scientists don't need to make themselves like mice just for the sake of the second law of thermodynamics.
Discrepancies between theoretically derived Bth and experimentally measured Btest don’t necessarily mean the second law of thermodynamics is violated. They often signal mismatches in modeling assumptions (like the interaction potentials used, the validity of low-density approximations, or the neglect of higher-order terms) or arise from experimental complexities that are not perfectly captured by idealized theory.
More deeply, this raises a philosophical challenge: we often assume the observer is external and separable from the system, applying laws as if from outside. But in many contexts — especially when pushing the boundaries of precision — the act of measurement itself couples observer and system. This recursive entanglement can generate subtle feedbacks, not because the second law fails, but because our models implicitly exclude the observer’s embeddedness.
Perhaps instead of seeing these mismatches as evidence of concealed failures, we should see them as opportunities to refine where and how we draw the line between system and observer — and to explore when that line starts to blur.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Materials Engineering
- Powders