Aline Hora Both the Qiaquant and Rotor gene machines are frequently used and have a solid reputation among scientists. The decision between the two is determined by your unique wants and requirements.

The Qiaquant machine is well-known for its dependability and precision, making it a good choice for quantitative PCR applications. It also provides a variety of detection modalities, such as fluorescence and absorbance, which can be beneficial for a variety of experimental designs.

The Rotor gene machine, on the other hand, is noted for its versatility and ease of use. It offers an easy-to-use interface that enables for quick and easy data analysis. It also has a high throughput capability, allowing it to analyze several samples at the same time.

Finally, the decision between Qiaquant and Rotor gene machines will be influenced by your individual experimental needs, such as sample throughput, detection modalities, and experimental design. It may be beneficial to contact with other researchers in your field or with company sales staff to discover which machine would best fit your needs.

I prefer the Rotor gene because it is a more advanced and flexible system than Qiaquant. Rotor gene is able to handle a wide range of applications such as PCR, qPCR, and RT-PCR, and it also has the capability to perform multiplexing and digital PCR. In addition, Rotor gene is easier to use and has a more user-friendly interface. Finally, Rotor gene has faster run times and more reliable data than Qiaquant.