A mi parece se trata de una reivindicación de una cancelación sistemática hacia el.
maybe, because my Spanish language competence is extremely poor, rather non existent, but perhaps better you elaborate your question somewhat.
because we have (ethics part I de deo)
e1p1
Propositio I . Substantia prior est natura suis affectionibus.
Demonstratio . Patet ex definitione 3. et 5.
and we have further the proof of e1p4:
e1p4d
Demonstratio . Omnia, quae sunt, vel in se, vel in alio
sunt (per axiom. 1.), hoc est (per defin. 3. et 5.), extra intellectum
nihil datur praeter substantias earumque affectiones. Nihil
ergo extra intellectum datur, per quod plures res distingui
inter se possunt praeter substantias sive, quod idem est (per
defin. 4.), earum attributa earumque affectiones. Q. e. d.
So now in the light of, say, these two: what's your question ?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Esthetics
- Interpretation