maybe, because my Spanish language competence is extremely poor, rather non existent, but perhaps better you elaborate your question somewhat.

because we have (ethics part I de deo)

e1p1

Propositio I . Substantia prior est natura suis affectionibus.

Demonstratio . Patet ex definitione 3. et 5.

and we have further the proof of e1p4:

e1p4d

Demonstratio . Omnia, quae sunt, vel in se, vel in alio

sunt (per axiom. 1.), hoc est (per defin. 3. et 5.), extra intellectum

nihil datur praeter substantias earumque affectiones. Nihil

ergo extra intellectum datur, per quod plures res distingui

inter se possunt praeter substantias sive, quod idem est (per

defin. 4.), earum attributa earumque affectiones. Q. e. d.

So now in the light of, say, these two: what's your question ?