The main challenge is the dissemination mechanism and identification approprate stakeholders. Research is actually shaped by what the stakeholders and communities need. So, Stakeholding Engagement started off as taking information to the stakeholders, telling them more about the project and what the aims of the project are, but then it's transitioned with time. It was really engagement instead of dissemination. Initially it was more dissemination than engaging, but with time, then we built relationships with stakeholders. They are able to tell us what they need and what's important for them. These make sense to disseminate and does make research impact.

There are many concerns about dissemination issues because what affects the education system and scientific research has to do with financing. However, those who invest such money want to profit from it and do not care about human values, moral issues, or the quality of human life. The result is most research projects aim at manufacturing weapons to exterminate humanity. The other problem is the censorship of information against such profitable interests and the associated narratives. We are at the point where we expect the worst to happen, either from a nuclear holocaust or the takeover of an artificial intelligence system, if it has not already happened. Some moral concerns of the situation we are facing are analyzed in the attached document.

Thank you for that reference, and I appreciate that you took the time to read my question; I am also here whenever you need it.

Problems: Journals charging for publication of scientific articles. Incompetent reviewers with political agendas. Misinformation and conspiracy theories of people who don't understand the scientific method. Underfunding our educational systems so they don't teach enough science. Hype from doctors who should know better.

Thanks for the response; I value the opinions and comments. My best wishes always

Dissemination of scientific knowledge is crucial for advancing research, innovation, and societal progress. However, several challenges can hinder the effective communication and dissemination of scientific information. Some of the main problems faced in the dissemination of scientific knowledge include:

1. Access Barriers: One of the most significant challenges is limited access to scientific publications and research findings due to subscription costs, paywalls, and copyright restrictions. This can hinder the dissemination of knowledge to researchers, policymakers, and the general public.

2. Language and Jargon: Scientific research often uses technical language and specialized terminology that may be difficult for non-experts to understand. Communicating complex scientific concepts in a clear and accessible manner can be a barrier to effective dissemination.

3. Publication Bias: There is a tendency for positive results to be published more frequently than negative or inconclusive findings, leading to publication bias. This can distort the overall scientific knowledge base and limit the dissemination of a comprehensive and balanced view of research outcomes.

4. Misinformation and Misinterpretation:Inaccurate or misleading information can spread rapidly through social media and other channels, leading to misunderstandings or misinterpretations of scientific findings. Addressing misinformation and promoting accurate scientific communication is essential for effective dissemination.

5. Lack of Open Access: Limited availability of research articles and data in open-access repositories can impede the dissemination of scientific knowledge to a wider audience. Open access initiatives can help increase transparency and accessibility of research findings.

6. Communication Gaps: There may be disconnects between researchers, policymakers, practitioners, and the general public in terms of communication channels, formats, and priorities. Bridging these communication gaps is essential for ensuring that scientific knowledge is effectively disseminated and applied.

7. Public Trust and Engagement: Building public trust in science and engaging with diverse audiences are critical for effective dissemination of scientific knowledge. Addressing skepticism, promoting transparency, and fostering dialogue with stakeholders can enhance the impact of scientific communication.

8. Resource Constraints:Limited funding, time, and resources for communication activities can pose challenges in disseminating scientific knowledge effectively. Investing in science communication training, infrastructure, and outreach efforts is essential for overcoming resource constraints.

Thank you very much for that clear and didactic answer, it is gratifying to know that I have not been the only one who has had these experiences that limit us in scientific development. I really appreciate the time you took to view and answer the question.