With one organization and around 30 staff- is it possible to do any statistical analysis to identify the factors that enhance the capacity of their clients and also ensure their process outcomes?
Need some technical help.
Thank you in advance for your kind cooperation.
It depends on what kinds of statistics you are talking about. If you want to test hypotheses and evaluate correlations, etc. than an N= 30 is almost certainly too small to produce meaningful results. The reason is because your standard errors will be quite large and confidence intervals correspondingly quite wide (in other words, your tests will have very low power).
It depends on what kinds of statistics you are talking about. If you want to test hypotheses and evaluate correlations, etc. than an N= 30 is almost certainly too small to produce meaningful results. The reason is because your standard errors will be quite large and confidence intervals correspondingly quite wide (in other words, your tests will have very low power).
Around 30 may be enough for some analysis according to the central limit theorem, but yes it depends on the kinds of statistics and variables.
Even though 30 is enough but it might be too small to obtain any significant finding
Dear Khondokar, I agree with my colleagues, 30 person for statistical analysis maybe enough in some cases, but it will be difficult to get significant results and overview the subject in-depth.
Thank you everyone for your kind opinion. In that case, I have to change my methodology and need to focus on more then one organization.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Physiology
- Biosignals
- Biomedical Signal Processing
- Statistical Analysis