It is said: The end justifies the means. People often succumb to internal or external pressures consciously or unconsciously to achieve their wishes or goals, and never care about the consequences or consequences of their behavior, and these behaviors may cause harm to others. what do you think ?
Adilson J. M. Silva Dr-Maysoon ALI A-ALHadi Aristidis Matsoukis Joshua O. Ighalo Ali Abbood Malik
Dear friends I thank you for this outstanding interest in my question Your views are really important Greetings.
It is not fair, but it is exactly what the militarily powerful nations uses.
Adilson J. M. Silva Dr-Maysoon ALI A-ALHadi Aristidis Matsoukis Joshua O. Ighalo Ali Abbood Malik
Dear friends I thank you for this outstanding interest in my question Your views are really important Greetings.
The important in this case is :what say the low", A good attorney and persistence is needed. Good luck to your friend.
Fred Romano Abdal Kareem M.A Dawagreh Joshua O. Ighalo Rad Maythil Teodora Hristova
Thank you my friends Your ideas are enlightening and useful
Agree@ Drs. Aristidis Matsoukis and Fred Romano's submissions
It is not fair at all. Violence cannot be justified regardless of any pretexts as so many people are sometimes killed in disputes which are not of their making.
It is not fair! Violence can be justified only in cases of self-defense when you are really in danger has no other option but to defend yourself as a last resort!
Violence cannot be justified; what is not fair, cannot be justified by any means..... every effort to make unfair...justified.....is in reality unfair...
Violence is for weak people, shamefully unable to admit their defeat. Perseverance is for winners. Remember Gandhi.
Fred Romano Nazia Asad Hassan Izzeddin Sarsak Hazim Al Dilaimy Olutosin Ademola Otekunrin
Your discussion is exciting and worthy of distinction. Thank you again
@ Fred Romano:
"A change born in violence" regretfully is still a Change
It is not fair to justify use of violence even if it is a means to an end. That means that even if you are tortured to do something violent by strong evil forces, you have to submit to the torture than comply with the evil requests of the oppressor. Perhaps it is easier said than done
people have different realities.The instances remarked on seem to concern the present rather than the future and perhaps indicate limited imagination.
Violence toward others is an expression of power over others and is not justified. However, there are instances where the use of violence (pushing a child put if the way of an oncoming car) avoids a greater tragedy. Violence can also be used to defend oneself from attack (preemptive strike). However, dialogue is better than violence, as often violence breeds violence and , unless exceptions apply, is not justifiable in most cases.
There is no justification for violence. It should be deplored by all.
Dear all,
Okay, here is the confusing question. Agreed that violence is deplorable, am I allowed to defend myself, my family, my country? When does my opinion that I am defending become I am the aggressor? It is not simply who stated the fight or who won the fight. The fight could be as evidenced by history be centuries old,
brigid
Violence cannot be justified because violence remains violence.
As per my own research, I find that there are at least 6 subtypes of aggression: predatory, anti-predatory, impulsive, defensive, affiliative and dominant. Not all lead to violence. When encountering real or perceived danger we can fight, flee, or freeze. Our primary cognitions center on threats of harm, loss, and challenge.
As I've indicated previously in previous posts on this subject re: combat vets, tho rigorously trained to kill, we detest killing other humans.
Attached are 2 of my published articles in this regard.
Rich
When he gives in to the fait accompli, he eventually loses everything
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Cognitive Science
- Thinking