Entrepreneurship may be considered from numerous perspectives - the identification and exploitation of opportunities (Corbett 2005; Wempe 2005; Ardichvili et al 2003; Eckhardt and Shane 2003). Dubin’s (1978) theory building framework outlines the antecedents for the opportunity identification process as being personality traits, social networks, and prior knowledge which together form entrepreneurial alertness to business opportunities. Also, the psychology and traits of the entrepreneur have been considered extensively giving rise to work focusing on cognition and learning (Corbett 2005; Zahra et al 2005 ).
Keep a look out for the forthcoming G. McElwee and R. Smith (eds) Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research, Volume V
Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M. A. (2001), Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strat. Mgmt. J., 22: 545–564. doi: 10.1002/smj.188
You might want to get a copy of Huntington and Harrison (eds), (2000), Culture matters: How values shape human progress. The book has some good chapters to get a grip on your topic. Available on Amazon.
Yes, I have written a paper on the same subject. You have to adopt North (1991) and Williamson (2000) theory of institutions to view culture and society as institutions which influence the entrepreneurial process.
I have another paper on knowledge integration. You can reference it may be another idea in Cultural entrepreneurship.
Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.
Personality and sociocultural environment including demographics has determining impact on entrepreneurship. You may take help from few of my papers. One can find many related papers cited in the below listed papers:
Kundu, S.C. and Rani, S. (2008), “Human resources’ entrepreneurial attitude orientation by gender and background: a study of Indian Air Force trainees”, International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 77-101.
Kundu, S.C. and Rani, S. (2010), “Entrepreneurial tendencies of aspiring human resources in India: a multivariate analysis”, International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp.333-57.
Kundu, S.C. and Rani, S. (2013), “Demographic and personality determinants of entrepreneurial tendencies of aspirant human resources”, In Driving the Economy through Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer India, pp. 377-388.
Women entrepreneurs with high socio-cultural status have significantly different in their views and opinions then their counterparts from with low socio cultural status.
Research found that socio cultural factors significantly affect women entrepreneurs and their contribution towards state economy.
Research also discloses that socio-cultural factors like Socio-cultural diversity, Socially acceptable choice of enterprise, Lack of intermediaries, Socio-cultural support, Values & beliefs, Socio-cultural stereotypes, Exposure, Socio-cultural environment, Socialization, Public relation, Family responsibilities & pressure, Customer attitude and Society’s attitude are identified most influential factors that has major influence on women entrepreneurs.
Whereas, Entrepreneurs’ role in the economy, Mobility, Acceptance, Traditional norms, Prejudice and Lack of women role model are the factors which does not have considerable impact on women entrepreneurs
The Women entrepreneurship based on socio-cultural, may be classified as:
1. Opportunity - based entrepreneurship - an entrepreneur perceives a business opportunity and chooses to pursue this as an active career choice.
2. Necessity - based entrepreneurship – an entrepreneur is left with no other viable option to earn a living. It is not the choice but compulsion, which makes him/her, chooses entrepreneurship as a career
Perhaps your school library might carry the Oxford Handbooks Online. One of these handbooks is Theories of Entrepreneurship: Historical Development and Critical Assessment by Martin Ricketts, The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship.
You can see information here: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199546992.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199546992-e-2
Kettunen, J., Penttilä, T. & Kairisto-Mertanen, L. (2013). Innovation pedagogy and desired learning outcomes in higher education, On the Horizon, 21(4), 333-342.
Your article on 'Innovation Pedagogy for Universities of Applied Sciences' is very interesting and gives some insightful ideas on teaching innovation in universities. However not addressing the major problem in entrepreneurship ' whether innovation could be taught seems to be a major gap. If entrepreneurship is an ability of individuals with special trait (risk bearing and capability of identifying opportunities), Shane (2003), then one has to assume that university students are equipped these abilitis. If not, teaching innovation will not be a fruitful exercise.
Then it is important to adopt a screening test to select student for innovation pedagogy. Further, such an exercise will also be a good research to address the the problem ' whether Innovation/entrepreneurship could be taught or entrepreneurship is an inborn talent'.
i will suggest you look at some conceptual framework under entrepreneurship: the integrative theory, the culturalist approach and mixed embeddedness particularly.
Hi, this book focusses on indigenous entrepreneurship, and a number of contributors highlight the critical importance of culture to indigenous entrepreneurs:
Dana, L-P & Anderson, R. (Eds.), International handbook of research on indigenous entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Some recent work of ours considers the role of context in shaping entrepreneurship. In particular, we consider Schwartz's values theory to analyse the influence of culture on the entrepreneurial potential of people.
A culture averse to business foundation may suppress start-up activities. This would, be the case when entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship have a bad image within a society or a region and the individual therefore does not consider this option of livelihood although he or she does not harbour any reservations towards entrepreneurs. In such a case there is a relationship between culture and business foundation activity not on the individual level but also on the level of groups, region or society.
KEY POLICY ISSUES IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SME DEVELOPMENT