Dear Vadym Slyusar

I completely agree with you. I am giving my article, though it is in Russian

Article Учение о биосфере-ноосфере в трудах В.И. Вернадского

Regards, Sergey

interested

The evolutionary ascent of man to personality as a transcendental entity finds expression in the cultural samples of human civilization, in religion, philosophy, as well as in science, which are engaged in the search for the transcendent, as well as adequate forms of its realization, augmentation and preservation. This transcendent is the Absolute, Which, according to its definition, is outside the world and creates it: the Absolute is identical with itself, unique and unrepeatable, and therefore, as Hegel wrote, “the simple initial identity of the absolute is indefinite, or, rather, in this identity any certainty of essence and existence, or being as a whole ... "[Hegel, 1971-1974, vol. 2, p. 173]. "One in Taoism means

The Absolute is in a state of ineffability that precedes all phenomena: its creative principle is realized through a double movement - through the separation of one in two and through a new synthesis. Infinity arises from these metamorphoses "[Zavadskaya, 1975, p. 215]. V. S. Soloviev defines the absolute as, on the one hand, "free ... complete, complete, complete, whole", which is "all in positive potential", as well as "the power of everything", and on the other hand, as "absolutely nothing", "when you free and renounced of everything "[Soloviev, 1990, vol. 2, p. 231]. In this aspect, the "I" of man as a free transcendental entity reveals the Divine nature.

The above reasoning is an explanation of all and all kinds of logical-semantic and ontological paradoxes: a paradox is a combination of incompatible things - one and multiple (internal and external, part and whole, continual and discrete, artificial and natural ...) into a paradoxical fusion - the Whole. Therefore, the world as a synergistic Whole, in which incompatible things are integrated, is a paradoxical, miraculous essence, there is a sacrament that modern science must accept as a constructive element, if it is wants to rise to a new dialectical stage of its development, in which the paradox as a phenomenon the religious and mythological must find a place that befits him, which will inevitably lead to a synthesis of science and religion, which finds expression in the problem of preserving religious traditions - which is especially relevant together with the need to preserve national identity, with what is the reason for the surge of patriotism and nationalism in recent decades, the revival of religious traditions, when science and religion as forms of social consciousness begin to integrate.

Actualization of the Whole is realized at the level of synchronization of the functions of the hemispheres of the human brain, the right of which reflects the world as a single one (this is the continual-field aspect of the Universe), the left one - as a multiple (this is a discrete-material aspect of the Universe), and their synthesis leads to the possibility of mastering the paradoxical nature of the Whole, in which the continuous and the discrete are combined, which gives rise to logical paradoxes when a person seeks to interpret the Whole logically.

In the field of psychological, pedagogical and biological, cyclicality is realized in numerous cyclical processes, for example, in the form of "iterative learning" (understood as repeated repetition of the a system of actions, trials, attempts, etc. to achieve a fixed goal under constant external conditions), implemented in systems of animate and inanimate nature - a person, a group of people, animals, artificial systems [Novikov, 1998].

It should be noted that the display strategies of the hemispheres are determined, due to the unity of the world, the universal material dichotomy of the Universe. Matter conceptually differentiates into two polar types - substance and field. A substance that has a rest mass and is characterized by a certain structure that

is a discrete-multiple form, correlates with information, as a fundamentally multi-structural entity, which is reflected by the left hemisphere. The field, which does not have a rest mass and is, as it were, motion in its pure form, is a continual-integral entity, correlating with energy as a measure of motion, which is reflected by the right hemisphere. This conclusion seems quite reasonable if we take into account the fact, recognized by psychologists, that emotions are associated with the need-instinctual sphere of a person [Magdaugall, 1984], and needs, in turn, are an energetic essence [Drown, 1953; Madsen, 1965].

That is why the right hemisphere can be called the substrate of the need-energy, and the left - the information-field regulation of the human body.

This conclusion on the functions of the hemispheres is quite close to the information theory of emotions by P.V. Simonov [Simonov, 1984, 1987], since it can be assumed that the right hemisphere perceives high-frequency

(energy), and the left one - low-frequency (information: information within the framework of information theory is defined as a measure of the frequency of certain events that "carry" the more information, the more rare they are) environmental signals.

In the mental structure of the melancholic, who, as PV Simonov writes, is sensitive to insignificant (unlikely) signals, the left hemisphere plays the first violin; To understand the essence of the melancholic, F. Klix's thought that the more subtle the necessary differences are, the stronger the need for more differentiated ways of transmitting information can help. Cognition and information, cognitive level development that has been achieved and the subtleties of the transmitted message mutually condition each other [Kliks,

1983, p. 90].

At that time, in a phlegmatic person, whose activity can be excited by signals of highly probable events, the activity of the transition from the right to the left hemisphere predominates.

The state of transition from the left to the right hemispheric psychological mode is characteristic, probably, for choleric, and the state of activity of the right hemisphere is for a sanguine person.

The state of hemispheric synthesis is characteristic of the process of integration of all previous states, when thinker and artist (left and right hemispheric entities) are united in one person.

Thus, four mental modes can correlate with both four types of hemispheric

activity, and with four types of neuroses, which P.V. Simonov associates with a violation of one of their departments human brain.

We believe that since the hemispheres act as a kind of psychosomatic focus of a person, four types of neuroses correspond to one of the modes considered.

So rooting in the phase of transition from right to left hemispheric activity (PP → LP) responds, we believe, obsessive-compulsive neurosis, which indicates the cyclical nature of mental processes (namely the activity of the right hemisphere is associated with the cycloid type of person, which is correlated with the cyclic

neuroses), which is characteristic of right-brain states.

Rooting in the state of the left hemispheric mode (LP) corresponds to psychasthenia (a state of fear, uncertainty, hesitation), which follows from the characteristics of the left hemispheric response to insignificant low-probability environmental stimuli.

Rooting in the phase of transition from right to left mode (PP → LP) corresponds to hysteria (demonstrative experiences), because in this case we have a tendency to develop the emotional right hemisphere state

(or suggestive state: as some researchers believe, the right hemisphere is actively in the state hypnotic trance [Kastrubin, 1995]), which, when combined with role-playing, egocentric left-brain behavior, presupposes a reaction of a demonstrative-hysterical, exalted character.

Rooting in the state of the right mode (PP) corresponds to neurasthenia (overstrain), since in this case, a developed right-brain state of emotional arousal is implicit, which leads to depletion of emotional resources of mental activity.

I think that the common morphic field concept has as origin the V. I. Vernadsky's idea about Noosphere.

Dear Vadym Slyusar

I completely agree with you. I am giving my article, though it is in Russian

Article Учение о биосфере-ноосфере в трудах В.И. Вернадского

Regards, Sergey

Dear Pushkin Sergey Viktorovich , thank you for your article.

Thank you Mr Pushkin Viktorovich for sharing this item.

Kind regards.

Morphic resonance works through morphic fields, which organize the bodies of plants and animals through vibratory patterns, and underlie their abilities to regenerate and heal after damage. Morphic fields also coordinate the vibratory activities of the nervous system, and are closely connected to mental activity.

https://quantumuniversity.com/quantum-medicine/morphogenetic-fields/

A morphogenetic field is a group of cells able to respond to discrete, localized biochemical signals leading to the development of specific morphological structures or organs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphogenetic_field#:~:text=In%20the%20developmental%20biology%20of,specific%20morphological%20structures%20or%20organs.

In the developmental biology of the early twentieth century, a morphogenetic field is a group of cells able to respond to discrete, localized biochemical signals leading to the development of specific morphological structures or organs.

Thank you for sharing this Question

Dear Dragoljub Šarović As per my own observation and experience, morphic field does exist. I agree with your views.

Thanks!!!

In the developmental biology, a morphogenetic field is a group of cells able to respond to discrete, localized biochemical signals leading to the development of specific morphological structures or organs. The spatial and temporal extents of the embryonic field are dynamic, and within the field is a collection of interacting cells out of which a particular organ is formed https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphogenetic_field

... for understanding the development of plants, their morphogenesis, genes and gene products are not enough. Morphogenesis also depends on organizing fields. The same arguments apply to the development of animals. Since the 1920s many developmental biologists have proposed that biological organization depends on fields, variously called biological fields, or developmental fields, or positional fields, or morphogenetic fields. All cells come from other cells, and all cells inherit fields of organization. Genes are part of this organization. They play an essential role. But they do not explain the organization itself. https://www.sheldrake.org/research/morphic-resonance/introduction

Morphogenetic fields are not fixed forever, but evolve. The fields of Afghan hounds and poodles have become different from those of their common ancestors, wolves. How are these fields inherited? I propose that that they are transmitted from past members of the species through a kind of non-local resonance, called morphic resonance. The fields organizing the activity of the nervous system are likewise inherited through morphic resonance, conveying a collective, instinctive memory. Each individual both draws upon and contributes to the collective memory of the species. This means that new patterns of behaviour can spread more rapidly than would otherwise be possible. For example, if rats of a particular breed learn a new trick in Harvard, then rats of that breed should be able to learn the same trick faster all over the world, say in Edinburgh and Melbourne. There is already evidence from laboratory experiments (discussed in A New Science of Life) that this actually happens.https://www.sheldrake.org/research/morphic-resonance/introduction

Dragoljub Šarović

Sheldrake proposes that there is a field within and around a morphic unit that organizes its characteristic structure and pattern of activity. According to this concept, the morphic field underlies the formation and behavior of holons and morphic units and can be set up by the repetition of similar acts and/or thoughts. The hypothesis says that a particular form belonging to a certain group that has already established its (collective) morphic field, will tune into that morphic field. The particular form will read the collective information through the process of morphic resonance, using it to guide its own development. This development of the particular form will then provide, again through morphic resonance, feedback to the morphic field of that group, thus strengthening it with its own experience resulting in new information being added (i.e. stored in the database). Sheldrake regards the morphic fields as a universal database for both organic (living) and abstract (mental) forms.

In layman's terms, the theory proposes that any form looks always alike because it "remembers" its form through repetition and that any new form having similar characteristics will "use" the pattern of similar forms already existing as a guide for its appearance.

https://discworld.fandom.com/wiki/Morphic_field

To Mrs.Nirmala S.V.S.G and Mr.Chinaza Godswill Awuchi ,

Thank you for sharing these items.

Kind regards.

I decided to add one more remark to the question.

Morphic fields are studied by various sciences. Physicists know string theory well. It is good to apply to physical objects, it manifests light on the existence of different-dimensional spaces. But for biological objects this is not applicable; they are well studied at the level of unicellular animals and and lower metazoans. It is known that cells communicate, share information, think, learn. When it is a homogeneous conglomerate, it is understandable. When we transfer this knowledge to mammals and humans, it is not entirely clear and explainable how this mechanism works. Here, only the use of electromagnetic waves and fields is not enough.

Maybe someone has such information, I will be grateful for the answer.

Regards, Sergey

Thank you very muchi

Thank you very much

Thank you very much

Thank you very muchi

Thank you very much

Thank you

Thank you very much

Thank you very much

Thank you

Thank you very muchi

Unfortunately, I had not heard of this before and certainly adds to understanding-although I suspect it is already within our intellectual horizons in other forms.

To Mr.Abdelghani Rouini ,

Thank you for sharing this item.

Kind regards.

If such a field exists, it is not conscious or self-conscious, but only an information field, possibly generated by quantum entanglements.

Agreed with dear Faraed Salman

I believe Richard Sheldrake has hypothesised this idea of morphogenic f field

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Sheldrake