When we think, what do we do? Do we philosophize or exercise science? Neither, either or both? How is thinking not science and how is thinking an act of science? How is it philosophy and how not a philosophy? Is there an overlap and yest separation in definitions etc.
Muneeb Faiq Thinking seeks nothing. Science finds things that were previously in a mere state of potential. Thinking is not articulated in anything other than its not being contradictory. Thinking is the internal coherence of every research, which knows how to respect and always recognize the difference between the subject who knows and the known object. The act of science is simple cause and effect verification; the act of science verifies the regularity and constancy of a true thought. There is thought without science but there is no science without thought.
Muneeb Faiq Thinking seeks nothing. Science finds things that were previously in a mere state of potential. Thinking is not articulated in anything other than its not being contradictory. Thinking is the internal coherence of every research, which knows how to respect and always recognize the difference between the subject who knows and the known object. The act of science is simple cause and effect verification; the act of science verifies the regularity and constancy of a true thought. There is thought without science but there is no science without thought.
Hi,
I think. . .
Philosophy was a precondition for science, a science without philosophy was unthinkable. But, today the philosophy of science is made, that is, philosophy is trying to keep up with science. With the effect of this change, thinking that is the sine qua non of philosophy, took its place in science as an act of practicality, in some way thinking has gained new meaning. In spite of all these changes, philosophy and science are complementary to each other.
The application of scientific methodology is decisive as criterion; humans have about 90000 thoughts per 24h; if all of these thoughts were science, we would not have to struggle with so many unsolved problems of life and information gathering, in terms of methodical research.
I would love to share here a new perspective on human intelligence and cognition. After thirty-five years of working on a new physics i have come to observe a completely new paradigm in human intelligence and cognition.
Article A Technical Approach to Understanding Cognition
The crux of this new paradigm is a realization that nothing truly collides in nature; that one new principle of Robust Entanglement defines atomic motion. Then, the nuances of the special properties of each of four new forms of energy, or field formed, creates a whole new understanding and appreciation for the human condition and cognition.
The article above in the first couple of paragraphs, summarizes this new physics, to offer background. Then, the article describes and summarizes a whole new understanding of human condition, disease and evolution, critical in understanding the dynamics involved in this new understanding of cognition. Finally, the article walks you through the many nuances of the new factors and elements in human thought, offering a whole new perspective; one that i hope will enlighten the researcher and reveal important areas for new research.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Cognitive Science
- Thinking