It depends on the industrial and governmental context that surrounds the market. Governments who prioritize sustainability, set the regulations, taxes and subsidies in a way that it makes it economically justifiable for universities and industries to collaborate and support various sectors of the market with services and products that are in line with sustainable development goals and strategies. Such market is sustainable as it supports and gets supported by sustainable industries, governmental decisions and academic knowledge production.

Dear colleague, I think this is a strategic issue depending on the government orientations. These alternative resources and the adoption of friendly technologies and the diffusions of innovation in the production process will greatly developpe the green economy. However, for the low and lower-middle-income economies, this needs a real partnership with UNs organization to get the requisite expertise to establish the green economy in accordance with the sustainable development goals.

May I suggest some of my papers which I attempt to develop these ideas, for example:

Article The controversy of the resource curse and the environment in...

Article Literature survey on the relationships between energy, envir...

Article Sustainability Challenge in the Agenda of African Countries:...

Article EKC and Macroeconomics Aspects of Well-being: a Critical Vis...

First of all in agriculture I think.

Good day. If you include the decarbonisation of the global economy under green economy then you should add the minerals industry to your list. Wind and solar farms and battery electric vehicles (BEV) require certain mineral commodities for their construction and manufacturing and in different quantities than the current carbon-based economy. BEVs require, for example, more copper than the petrol or diesel driven internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV). (Another example is the need for platinum in low temperature fuel cells used in fuel cell electric vehicles.) Some of these changes had been visible for a number of years already - companies who are shifting their portfolio of mines towards lithium and other mineral commodities required for a decarbonized economy. Associated with this is that certain investment, finance and mining companies are reducing their exposure to fossil fuels. Many papers are available on this topic. Hope this is what you are looking for. Best wishes with your research. Regards, Willie

Colleagues and Friends from RG, On the basis of the above considerations and conclusions from the discussion on interesting issues discussed, I formulated the following thesis that the transformation of the classical economy towards green economy should be implemented in every major strategic field of the national economy sector, including primarily in the energy sector to develop renewable sources energy. Therefore, as part of ecological policy, the state should support programs for the implementation of ecological reforms in the energy sector and the development of ecological innovations, thanks to which it will be possible to effectively implement the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development in economic processes in line with the green economy philosophy.

In the context of the above considerations, the following key questions arise:

- How long, how many years can it take to realize fully pro-ecological reforms in the energy sector, i.e. reforms consisting in the transformation of classic energy based on the burning of minerals into the ecological, harmless to the environment and climate of the planet Earth, energy based on the production of energy from renewable energy sources?

- What types of eco-innovations, including those related to the development of renewable energy sources, development of electromobility, improvement of waste segregation, development of recycling, conversion of plastic into biodegradable materials, improvement of the purification of the environment from civilization toxins, etc. should be developed in order to continue the transformation of the classic economy into green economy?

- Will man manage to transform the classic economy into green economy, among others on supporting programs for the development of eco-innovations and other pro-ecological reforms underpinning before a progressive global warming process can lead to a global climate disaster at the end of the 21st century?

- What are your recommendations for the quick implementation of the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development in economic processes carried out in accordance with the concept of the transformation of classical economics towards green economy?

What is your opinion on this topic?

Please reply

Dear Colleagues and Friends from RG,

Classic economy should transform into a green economy in accordance with the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development, and ecological innovations should be financed from green finance sources. A very important topic for humanity and biodiversity of planet Earth. Environmental reforms are necessary to reduce the negative effects of environmental pollution and the global warming process that is moving faster and faster. The implementation of the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development is necessary to avoid a global climate catastrophe, armageddon, which may appear at the end of the 21st century, if the classic economy is not converted into a green economy in the next dozen or so years. There is little time left to save humanity and the biodiversity of planet Earth. Afforestation of civilization degraded areas is an important element of sustainable pro-ecological development conducted according to the green economy philosophy. Promoting in the media the necessity to implement the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development in accordance with the green economy philosophy in order to make society aware of the highest priority of these issues is very important. Also in the curricula of schools and colleges should be included issues of implementation of the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development. Also non-governmental institutions, public institutions and also commercial enterprises should already join the promotion of the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development in accordance with the green economy philosophy, including running pro-ecological projects financed from gren finance sources. In recent years, there are more and more commercially functioning enterprises and financial institutions that are joining these pro-ecological activities. Some of these institutions want to improve their image through parasocial marketing campaigns and public relations conferences. It is also good action at the beginning of the road towards moving and making society aware of the highest priority of the issue of sustainable pro-ecological development in accordance with the green economy philosophy.

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this topic?

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

Please reply

I invite you to discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Absolutely agriculture and food industry. Hunger is an important motive.