Many industrialized countries have sought to develop a framework of opportunities and various resources, organized to cause catalysts of economic forces. In countries where this establishment has not done, what is happening?
In many countries, research is conducted on the relationship between national economic policy, the implementation of specific objectives of socio-economic development by local government units and key determinants and the pace of socio-economic development of a specific region of the country, commune, voivodship, district, etc. I studied this issue with taking into account the importance of innovation in the activities of regional public institutions, including local government units, and in the issue of activating innovation and entrepreneurship of business entities operating in the area of a given commune.
Resource mobilization is important thing for development where developing countries have been faced hindering due to administrative complex, and therefore, relationship between decentralization in terms of administrative competency and territorial development is obvious.
Administrative decentralization can be easily carried out politically, but giving autonomous functioning is not allowed. This is the case in many undeveloped countries like Nigeria. In the case of Nigeria, tribalism/ethnicity, politics, religion, socio-cultural fear, prejudice, stereotype, discrimination and even hatred are often the determinants of administrative decentralization. Basically, administrative decentralization in Nigeria is very fragile, as it can be altered easily to achieve political and ethic favour. The foregoing makes territorial development very challenging.