Yes, i will try today according to your suggestions, and if i need your more help, i will ask you if you dont mind please. Thanks alot @ Mariel Gullian Klanian
If the correltation of the two tells you anything, you can do the calculations in Microsoft Excel by using a simple formula as follows:
Arrange the two values in a certain order in two adjucent columns
Then type the following formula in any cell: =Pearson (Array1, Array2) Drug-select the datasets in the different column for the arrays.
The formula gives you a calculated pearsons correlation coefficient (r) value, which can be either positive or negative.
Compare this value with the critical value Table of (r) in statistics text books or the internet at the degree of freedom of n-2, where n is the number of paried data values you used in the calculations.
Conclusion: if the calculated value from your data is at least as large as the critical value from the Table, then the Correlation is apparent, which means there is a natural correlation between the two parameters (not just due only to a chance).
your question is ill formulated. Probably you asked about " correlation of phenolic content " with antioxidant activity (how fast they are) or with TAC (Total Antioxidant Capacity, the amount of antioxidants in 1 g of your sample). I could predict that TAC would be linearly dependent on phenolic content , and the activity would be weakly dependent on phenolic content. While, it might significantly depend on the nature of "phenolics"
Dear Tadesse Fikre Teferra , I agree with you but you did not mention what two "parameters" should be used.
Dear Mariel Gullian Klanian , I recommended your very professional answer. I would post the same with some minor variations.
The question is not HOW but WHY, specially considering that you are actually "measuring" your polyphenols using an antioxidant assay (Folin-Ciocalteu measures reducing capacity). So of course you'll find high correlations, as has been reported thousands of times. But they are not relevant as you have not actually measured the polyphenols, this requires HPLC, probably also solvolysis, and a good kowledge of extraction methods.
For more the specificity, I agree with you. thanks. However, the question asked about the relationship or "Correlation of phenolic content with antioxidants? "
Yurii V Geletii Since we are interested in causation, simply finding a correlation is NOT sufficient. We must establish and identify the causal mechanism, and show that it is causation, and not simply correlation. Is this correct?
Olaniyi Amos Fawole FC assay DOES NOT measure the total antioxidant content! It does not measure the total phenol content. This work has been cited more than 13000 times
Article Analysis of Total Phenols and Other Oxidation Substrates and...
FC measures the total number of electrons from a sample to reduce Mo(VI) to Mo(V) under conditions of the assay. A calibration, e.g. using gallic acid, gives a relative number of electrons compared with gallic acid. This is well explained in the ref , Which I provided earlier.
Maybe let's start with a graphical illustration of the data. Moreover, which phenolic compounds, because most of them, have antioxidant properties. So it is as if we wanted to find a correlation between antioxidants and antioxidants. Well. As I can guess, it is enough to use ANOVA.
Dear Mirosław Grzesik , you are absolutely right that "So it is as if we wanted to find a correlation between antioxidants and antioxidants." FC can be considered as an antioxidant assay for a certain family of chemical compounds, such as phenolics. For a correlation you need two numbers. Thus, a second antioxidant assay should be used for the same family of compounds. I guess that this has been already done and published.