Dear Valentino Straser

The Earthquake is a quantum mechanics phenomenon, and has no relation to electricity and magnetism.

Article Quantum Mechanics Earthquake

best

Dear Javad Fardaei,

Thank you for responding to my solicitation.

I just downloaded your work file which I will read with interest. One question: have you also calculated the energy associated with the seismic event?

Reagrds,

Valentino

Dear Valentino Straser

Please read the article, and if you find any error let me, but one thing you should be aware of, my approach is based on my research in quantum mechanics effect. Also my approach on Gravity, I find Gravity is Internal Not External. Nothing is working mechanically as we learned.

We all must think out the box.

Article Gravity is an Internal Force

best wishes.

Dear Javad Fardaei,

The hypothesis that you propose is fascinating and I also dealt with the relationship between the variations of micro gravity and earthquakes, also published on RG. Your study is reason for reflection on the complexity of the earthquake problem. As you know there are many causes triggering earthquakes and in the current state of research it is good not to neglect any of them.

Best regards,

Valentino

Dear Javad Fardaei,

I read your study and I recommended reading the article. Yours is a completely new view of gravity and I think you will find the Ether Theory that has many points in common with QM of interest to you. I will personally begin to consider your point of view.

With best regards,

Valentino

Dear Valentino,

I have read your work about sollar activity 'connection' to the triggering of big earthquakes... Here the problem is that you trying to understand something from its extreme that is why the simple phenomenon seems very complex...

Observing that in Europe nobody shows interest in my view... Yesterday I have sent a small letter to the Institute of earthquake forecasting China earthquake administration... I have told you I have the imagination of earthquakes... I have a response to this question, but what good will happen to me if I tell it... Such ideas are very valorous, who live in an earthquake active zones if they do not seek a modest compromise shoves well that they do not care about it... In this case, they really do not want to be written down such Ideas...

Dear Javad Fardaei you every time you are referring to Einstein and Newton, why you do not want to understand Galilei or Tesla, perhaps... Microcosmos activity is only true the macro cosmos (more precise onto the base of directly visible) can be understood... Who likes nature and trying to make 'continuous observation' he gets the next conclusion: everything (the 'small' and the big is governed onto the base of the same rules)... But as we observe in sport (boxing, judo, wrestling..) there are weight groups. So the quantum gravity and the earth gravity are in different 'weight groups (so the quantum scale cannot show an important effect on the observable scale ...

(In case of question important to know that the 'particular proton density' reaches such a level that can bring such physical condition which can affect the mechanism of earthquake... )

Regards,

Laszlo

Dear László Attila Horváth you are right I should mention Galileo, but to me he was much correct by his description of gravity force on that era more than Newton.

Newtonian gravity g=9.81 does not make an apple round, with this force of assumption gravity, apple should be like a banana. the rain drop should be pointed down. With mass of our earth, Newtonian mechanical gravity force, should not let water evaporated. Just cogitate for a minute. when inflated basketball hit the ground, it does not bounced up, but when we add more mass of oxygen (O^2*g=9.81) into the ball, ball would bounced up. This simple test and observation can not be answered by Newtonian mechanical gravity. Yes we do have some explanation, but it go away from Newton both gravity law.

The meaning of Micro-gravity and Quantum-gravity is totally different from each other, but unfortunately we think they are the same.

My theory is: Gravity is Internal in the atom (mass), but Einstein, Newton , and Galileo think is mechanical and outside of mass (atom) , our observation is telling us, nothing is working mechanically, everything must have QM foundation, where there is no friction. Everything in universe has a journey, and even our Earth. The Earthquake is part of its daily routine of earth, and in some point, it must release its energy through volcanoes.

Article Gravity is an Internal Force

Article Quantum Mechanics Earthquake

regards

Dear Javad Fardaei,

thanks for the in-depth comments on the subject. I added a study conducted together with Mario Campion that relates the micro-gravitational variations in correspondence with earthquakes in Central Italy. It is a gravimeter accurate to the seventh decimal place and with a damped pendulum. The instrument, still in an experimental phase, could also be useful for observations on "internal gravity".

Dear Javad Fardaei

I same do not accept gravities theories of Newton and Einstein... But take a look onto the Galileo's experiment of gravity from Pisa... What do you think the happening of falling objects... was beginning from a point 'outside of Earth surface'. Another thing Einstein's theory does not use gravity force... What do you think about gravity waves?

Do not give up, because you have good ideas, but needs a better study and try to formulate your thought carefully... Did you read my article:

Article Gravity a paradym shift in reasoning

There are explained a lot of macro and microphenomenon... Onto it was formulated a process which was first written by me planet-Erosion (2007) I will put soon the Hungarian version (it exists an erroneous part, the rejecting

TOM VAN FLANDERN’S ‘EXPLODED PLANET HYPOTHESIS’

So you can observe the origin of my gravity theory, can be applied in atomic level and macro can be explained with it the 'gravity wave', in the near feature will be used in earthquake forecasting (not by me, because I do not have opportunity to test my presumption).

Regards,

Laszlo

Thanks Laszlo and sorry for the delay in my reply.

I have been analyzing the gravitational or rather microgravitational interaction linked to earthquakes for several years and the results are very encouraging. I will present the study at two international conferences scheduled shortly, Covid-19 permitting.

Regards,

Valentino