The statistical analysis process in educational and psychological research is a systematic approach to understanding data, testing hypotheses, and drawing meaningful conclusions. It involves several key steps, which are critical for ensuring the validity and reliability of the findings. Below is an overview of the process:

1. Define the Research Question and Hypotheses

The process begins with a clear research question or objective, often derived from theory or prior research.

Hypotheses are formulated, specifying the expected relationships or differences between variables (e.g., "Students who receive intervention A will perform better than those who receive intervention B").

2. Design the Study

Choose an appropriate research design (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental, correlational, or descriptive).

Determine the sample size and sampling method (e.g., random sampling, stratified sampling) to ensure the results are generalizable.

Identify the variables (independent, dependent, and control variables) and operationalize them.

3. Collect Data

Use reliable and valid instruments (e.g., surveys, tests, observations) to gather data.

Ensure ethical considerations are addressed, such as informed consent and confidentiality.

4. Prepare and Clean the Data

Organize the data into a usable format (e.g., spreadsheets or statistical software).

Check for missing data, outliers, and errors. Address these issues through techniques like imputation or removal, depending on the context.

Recode or transform variables if necessary (e.g., creating composite scores or standardizing variables).

5. Choose Appropriate Statistical Methods

Select statistical techniques based on the research question, type of data, and assumptions of the tests. Common methods include

Following@

A research problem can be attached in different ways dependent on the research paradigm, tradition and the context. The choice of study design and of method of measurement will have great consequences of the choice of statistical methods.

The choice of measurement instruments for variables that are operationally defined by physical rules, e g length, height, concentration, velocity etc is often quite obvious, and standardized methods for controlling the measurement quality of the data are often available. There are no standardised operational definitions for qualitative variables, such as quality (of life, health, ), functioning, ability, pain etc

Svensson E. Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from ratings scales and questionnaires. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2001;33: 47-48.

Svensson E. Statistical methods for repeated qualitative assessments on scales. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42 Suppl 1:13-22.

Svensson E. Recent developments in analysis of paired ordinal data. Discussion of the paper Ivy Liu and Alan Agresti: The analysis of ordered categorical data: An overview and a survey of recent development. TEST 2005;14(1):1-73 pp 44-46.

Svensson E. Different ranking approaches defining association and agreement measures of paired ordinal data. Statistics in Medicine, 2012;31:3104-3117. (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI:10.1002/sim.5382.

Hadžibajramović E. Svensson E, Ahlborg G. Construction of a global score from multi-item questionnaires in epidemiological studies. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/282012174, RESEARCH · SEPTEMBER 2015, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1924.1442