"The h-index is an index that attempts to measure both the productivity and citation impact of the published work of a scientist or scholar. The index is based on the set of the scientist's most cited papers and the number of citations that they have received in other publications. The index can also be applied to the productivity and impact of a as well as a group of scientists, such as a department or university or country.
The index was suggested in 2005 by Jorge E Hirsch, as a tool for determining theoretical physicists' relative quality and is sometimes called the Hirsch index or Hirsch number.
The index is based on the distribution of citations received by a given researcher's publications.
A scientist has index h if h of his/her number of papers (Np) have at least h citations each, and the other (Np−h) papers have no more than h citations each. In other words, a scholar with an index of h has published h papers each of which has been cited in other papers at least h times. Thus, the h-index reflects both the number of publications and the number of citations per publication. The index is designed to improve upon simpler measures, such as the total number of citations or publications. The index works properly only for comparing scientists working in the same field; citation conventions differ widely among different fields." (Donald School "H-index and How to Improve it" Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, January-March 2016;10(1):83-89 )
"The h-index is an index that attempts to measure both the productivity and citation impact of the published work of a scientist or scholar. The index is based on the set of the scientist's most cited papers and the number of citations that they have received in other publications. The index can also be applied to the productivity and impact of a as well as a group of scientists, such as a department or university or country.
The index was suggested in 2005 by Jorge E Hirsch, as a tool for determining theoretical physicists' relative quality and is sometimes called the Hirsch index or Hirsch number.
The index is based on the distribution of citations received by a given researcher's publications.
A scientist has index h if h of his/her number of papers (Np) have at least h citations each, and the other (Np−h) papers have no more than h citations each. In other words, a scholar with an index of h has published h papers each of which has been cited in other papers at least h times. Thus, the h-index reflects both the number of publications and the number of citations per publication. The index is designed to improve upon simpler measures, such as the total number of citations or publications. The index works properly only for comparing scientists working in the same field; citation conventions differ widely among different fields." (Donald School "H-index and How to Improve it" Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, January-March 2016;10(1):83-89 )
The h-index is an author-level metric that attempts to measure both the productivity and citation impact of the publications of a scientist or scholar. The index is based on the set of the scientist's most cited papers and the number of citations that they have received in other publications.
It related with number of research citation and started with H-index 1 for one citation from research and ( H-index 2) means 2 citations for each research or paper.
As we know, the h-index gives a measure of actual scientific productivity and importance of a scientist. The h-index can be manually determined using citation databases or using automatic tools.
Several commonly used databases such as such Google Scholar and ResearchGate provide automatically generated h-index values. Subscription based databases such as Elsevier’s Scopus, Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science also provide these values. Anne-Wil Harzing's Publish or Perish (https://harzing.com) programme calculates the h-index based on Google Scholar entries. It can also be calculated manually using citation information given in databases such as Google Scholar.
Please note that because of differential coverage, each database is likely to produce a different h index for the same researcher. You may have noticed this when checking Google Scholar h-index and ResearchGate h -index.
Recently, Google has started providing an automatically-calculated i10-index within their own Google Scholar profile. This i10 index provides the number of publications with at least 10 citations.
The explanation given by Dr Dhiaa Neama Jabbar regarding is correct and that is internationally accepted and being used by google scholar and many other agencies. However what criteria is being used by Researchgate on H-Index is not very clear as there is hale of differences between the H-index of Research gate and google scholar. There is a need for intervention of Researchgate scientist for such query as many a time it create doubt in the minds of users.
H-index---considers the number of citations that your published articles have been cited. For example, I have several articles with 25+, 5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2 1, etc. citations. My h-index is 4 because I have at least 4 articles that have been cited at least 4 times. If the article with 4 citations gets an additional citation (25+, 5,5,5,3,2,2,1, etc.), then my h--index would be 5 because I have 4 articles that have been cited at least 5 times. However, if the article with 4 citations stays the same and the articles with 5 citations both become 6 for 25+, 6, 6, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1 etc. my h-index would still be 4 because I have 4 articles with at least 4 citations.
Dr. Yadav----as my example above shows, it is possible for one researcher to have different H-index based on the number of citations. Not all citations are listed on RG, Google, or other places like Scopus.
To extend my example above, 25+,5,5,4,3,2,2,1 etc. is a 4 h-index for Author 1. Author 2 may be a co-author on some of the first 3 items but have other articles-25+,5, 5, 9, 6, 7, 8,6,2,1,etc. In this case, the h-index would be a 6---6 articles with at least 6 citations. I think that there is confusion because everyone understands that there are a certain number of citations listed for each publication. But, the h-index is a composite of the best representation of the overall productivity of the author. Also, Google and RG are also dependent on who is a member of the group. For me, RG lists only 49 citations but I have more than that on other metrics. It is not a perfect science but just an indication for others to place a tentative value on your output. Perhaps to indicate that you are new to the field. The scale is also useful in certain criteria such as determining the value of a possible book for a specific topic because it would demonstrate some recognition within your field. Many individuals are rejected for great book ideas because they do not have a large enough prospective market based on their h-index. Because I am a health generalist and have published in the field of biomedical engineering, it was not a sure thing at all to have been accepted to publish on environmental science and public health.
The problem with ResearchGate 's h-index, I suppose, is due to their database with respect to our publications and number of citations. For example, my citations in ResearchGate is almost half of what is given in GoogleScholar. Consequently, according to GoogleScholar, my h-index is 6 and according to ResearchGate, it is 4!