The factor 1.5 is introduced to minimize the effect of possible variations in the background values which might be attributed to lithologic variations in the sediments. According to Bradl the reference samples are As: 13, Cd: 0.3, Co: 20, Cr: 100, Pb: 20 and Cu: 50 µg/g.
An index of geo-accumulation (Igeo) was originally defined by Müller (1969), and can be calculated by the following equation:
Igeo = log2 [Cs / (1.5*Cb)]
Cs is the measured concentration of the examined heavy metal in sample
1.5 is the background matrix correction due to terrigenous effects or the factor 1.5 is introduced to minimize the effect of the possible variations in the background
Cb is the geochemical background concentration or reference value of the metal or the background value of heavy metals in the uncontaminated sample.
I am afraid I should warn you. Igeo is not good for sediments irrespective of how frequently it is used for such rocks. Whenever sediment grain size varies, concentrations of all elements vary accordingly and thus any "safety factor" like 1.5 (as mentioned by previous sirs who answered your question) cannot help. Much better is to use local enrichment factor with 1) well-chosen reference element and 2) genuine local reference sediment (without the phenomenon you intend to address by Igeo). So, the crucial question is to what purpose you want to use Igeo. It is more tricky than it is assumed by 99% those who use it. If you want to discuss this topic, kindly write me [email protected]
you can find here my paper which contain all the statistcal analysis of pollution for heavy metals in water, sediment, total suspended matter and also for human risk
To assess the ecological risks of heavy metals in soil different methods have been widely used, geoaccumulation index (Igeo) .please refer the following attached file.
You can find a very nice discussion on the geochemical background in the article:
Matschullat, J., Ottenstein, R. & Reimann, C. Geochemical background – can we calculate it?. Environmental Geology 39, 990–1000 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002549900084
It may also be good to include leaching tests in your experiments to understand the relative mobilities of target pollutants. Pollution indices will give you a measure of how polluted the samples are, but they cannot show if the pollutants are mobile (bioavailable) or not. You can check out the attached paper about ASGM impacted soils if you're interested.
Maisha Binte Sultan Yes! The geoaccumulation index can be used for dust, as the dust is a composite of soil particles. You can find literature on this...