There are large volume of handbooks that prescribe suitable etchant for a particular metal or ceramic, But their theoretical justification is hardly ever mentioned. Then, is it possible to estimate (at least a first order approximation) composition of etchant for a metal/alloy (if its chemical constituents and possible present phases are known from standard thermodynamics and metallurgy) , solely from knowledge of organic and inorganic chemistry? Or just is it purely empirical trial-and error?

For example, nital or picral are good etchant for some ferrous alloys, but why is the acid nitric acid (cannot be sulfuric/hydrochloric/phosphoric?) instead of other strong acids; or picric acid instead of any other aromatic ortho-para trisubstituted (electron-withdrawing group) phenol? Is there any aromatic coordination chemistry or organometallic chemistry involved? Why is the other reagent alcohol instead of , say, water/ketone/aldehyde/ether; and why is the alcohol ethanol instead of, say, methanol, isopropanol or neopentanol?

Similar question can be posed for any other metal/alloy system and corresponding etchant. Exact metal or etchant are not asked here. And some related questions that may rise are

Is reactivity of particular metal contained in a microstructural phase with inorganic and organic reagents cannot be even first-order estimated with standard inorganic and organic chemistry? Why?

If coloring compound formation is the key, then how the color between transitional/ non-transitional metal and a ligand (can be organic chromophore) can be estimated with relatively simple first principle study?

More Sumit Bhowmick's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions