In one hand, there are limited number of data-points and so many features for the analysis, let’s say 50 data-points and 60 features. On the other hand, the unusual data-points are more important than the usual-points and you want to know the underline facts of happening those unusual data-points. How do you approach the analysis to tackle these two issues at the same time?

Any help would be appreciated.

More Amir Abolhassani's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions