This issue can be solved only through social participation and understanding the importance of this crisis.

First, by changing the technological processes with some more environmentally friendly. Second, by reducing excessive consumption and applying the principles of circular economy.

Awareness and commitment of all stakeholders.

Its quite obvious that there is nothing is absolutely perfect and without flaws or disadvantages. The technological advancement is one of such phenomena. However, it is very important for inventors and major stake holders to ascertain how the negative aspects these advancements would be reduced to the bearest minimum. I would support the green energy drive as a way to slow down the global warming process.

Change from fossil fuel to renewable energy might give major impact

Stop eating beef; stop using coal for energy production; leave coal in the ground; invest in solar, wind and hydro energy generation. This is just for starters.

AFFORESTATION is the only way besides judicious use of non-renewable resources.

Dear Dariusz Prokopowicz

We will not be able to do anything as long as oil exists. The best solution is to reduce traditional energies and encourage the use of clean energies in homes and government departments. We must work intensively to address pollution and convert thermal emissions into environmentally friendly emissions. We should encourage the hybrid car industry, which works on two energy exporters (fuel and clean energy)

Best Regards

Reduce population

This issue can be solved only through social participation and understanding the importance of this crisis.

Planting trees, avoiding deforestation and reduction of preserved areas. In addition there should be lines of financing and public policies for replacing energy matrices for those with low carbon emissions

Develop and Implement appropriate curricula at all levels of education

It is difficult to change the behaviors of 8 billion people with technology and business model innovation. Coordinated strategy / policy is needed.

I agree with you, but I think the most effective way nowadays is to pool our wisdom and use innovation to drive us to fundamentally change the current unhealthy life of the public.

Reduction of the pollutant at the source and plantation

We can reduce the Greenhouse effect, by using many strategies such as green energy, afforestation, judicious use to the waste management, green economy, sustainable development of resources, reduce of using fossil fuel in the industries, etc.

These strategies may reduce of the greenhouse gases production, which cause global warming.

There are several effective strategies that do not require large financial investments available now to mitigate global carbon emissions, including, but not necessarily in this order:

1. Stop eating beef would be a relatively easy start

Ratnasiri, S., & Jayatilleke Bandara, J. (2017). Changing patterns of meat consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in Australia: Will kangaroo meat make a difference? PLoS ONE 12(2): doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.01701301

2. Passive solar designed residential, commercial and industrial buildings to minimise energy required for heating and cooling.

3. Mandatory education for our children and their parents via the existing primary and secondary school systems on climate change and limited global fossil fuel reserves, together with strategies that already exist on how we can each reduce our carbon footprint. It is important to identify the solutions currently available to prevent the population from giving up.

4. Providing universities with the necessary funding to conduct effective research into more active measures to reduce carbon emissions, and to plan for sustainable living on an already warming planet.

Further more active, existing measures include:

5. Utilise PV solar panels, wind power, wave power etc for energy generation

6. Install Solarwhiz extraction fans into new and existing buildings to actively remove stored heat from roof spaces powered by the sun.

7. Plant forests and encourage photosynthetic phytoplankton growth to draw down carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and increase oxygen production.

totally agree with you sir.

there are many ways for us to go around with these. since John Wilkerson said that its hard to change the mentality of 8 billion people, we should always find an alternative sustainable way. trees are great sinks for carbon dioxide. but major carbon sink is the sea and one of the most contributor is whales. we should have a nursery ground for whales to breed. we have to let whales population rise at least half of the population before human started hunting whales. we have to further decrease the amount of whales being catch per year. these is because whales can contribute in carbon dioxide absorption. which will eventually drop the amount of carbon dioxide per year, accounting in hundred tons.

In the context of the progressive warming of the Earth's climate, the following question is of particular importance:

How can environmental protection and biodiversity be improved by using current ecological technologies?

Due to the current civilization progress in recent decades, acceleration of the development of industry, automotive, urban agglomerations, intensification of agricultural production, etc. and related greenhouse gas emissions, global warming, ozone layer depletion in the atmosphere, increase of environmental pollution, growing problem of smog in urban agglomerations, the increase in pollution of the seas and oceans to which unsorted waste is thrown away is cut out as part of the predatory economy of tropical forests in the Amazon and other largest natural forest ecosystems.

In addition, the secondary effect of global warming of the Earth's climate is the increasing, more frequent weather anomalies, including drought, leading to steppe and desertification of areas that were previously natural forest ecosystems or areas exploited by agriculture.

As a result of the above-mentioned processes, every year many species of flora and fauna disappear forever.

As a result, natural biodiversity diminishes, which for millions of years evolved evolutionally on Earth.

In this way the natural resources of the planet Earth are irretrievably in decline.

In view of the above, the issue of environmental protection and biodiversity is one of the most important challenges of humanity in the 21st century.

Classical economics must change towards a green economy based on the strategy of sustainable pro-ecological development.

Therefore, I am asking you for the following query:

How can environmental protection and biodiversity be improved by using current ecological technologies?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

I think that at the current stage of global warming and the slow human response to the problem it is necessary to start by locally controlling carbon emissions and energy matrices ... from where we are, there will not be a single solution and a globalizing discourse has allowed for the Many.

I think that the best chance is to switch more successfully from fossil fuels as major sources of energy to cleaner energy. What also is needed is afforestation and slowing down deforestation to increase net CO2 sinks. Finally to organize societies better, so that inefficient and unnecessary use / waster of resources is reduced.....

Paris agreement has initiated a good movement towards limiting the increase of global average temperature below 2 degree centigrade. However, this is not enough at all. We as global citizens and owners of our businesses should be all responsible and committed to our environmental conservation within any aspect that we can. Conscious purchase and disposal, thinking about long-term impacts of our activities can make a huge difference if all the end-users do so.