Managers will write KPI for their respective area.
So it will cover Organizational KPI.
I am confused about my KPI report.
Should i write about
1)Task achieved such as Method Validations, PT and all experiments(analysis) which i did in last year, Reviewing Quality Manual and procedures for ISO 17025
or
2) Things which i am planning for next year i.e. Applying for Accreditation.
These are some inputs which may help you in framing KRI
1. Purpose of your position in the organisation?
2. Define the job to be done ( sample analysis, demonstration, accreditations-any certifications, number of inter laboratory testing participations, ratings, waste disposal management)
2. Lead days/time for sample analysis
3. No of customer complaints and lead days to resolve the same
3. Annual Target to be achieved
4. Annual budget and how much saved on that
5. What new technologies/ innovations introduced by you so as to better the business.
6. Road map for an year, plan for continual improvement.
Sriram Balachandran has addressed the most of the points that I wanted to write later. That is correct. Accordant to your position and nature of the works, you can include some research targets also to the job description.
The important thing is your management or your self have to quantify the achievable the targets .
You may also check the link for some common metrics which can be used to measure and optimize laboratory performance/productivity: http://www.isobudgets.com/7-performance-metrics-to-optimize-laboratory-quality-and-productivity/
Once you write your job description which should cover all the activities you suppose to do . Once you do that you can derive 4 or 5 KRA out of that. As you may know when you define KRA go by SMART principle . As an example if one of your target is to get laboratory accreditation for your lab, you need to put timeline for that, like with in an year and hence your KRA may be to get lab accreditation by December 31st of 2019 . Then you need to break up and have target for each month or each quarter etc. to achieve the same. Similarly you can define other measurable KRAs/KPIs . Hope this helps..
you already received a lot of excellent suggestions and advice! Please allow me to add my two cent.
When I had to come up with KPIs, targets, goals (different names for the same game) for my team's members I came to appreciate the SMART rule. Of course it is an abbreviation, which stands for
S_pecific (a good KPI, target, goal needs to be specific in wording and clearly understood)
M_easurable (you need to be able to "count" your achievements. An accreditation can be counted as achieved (Yes = 1) or not achieved (No = 0))
A_greed upon (You and your management need to agree on the specifics and the measures! )
Sometimes the "A" is interpreted as
A_chievable (The specific and measured KPI needs to be achievable).
Realistic (The specific and measures and agreed target/KPI needs to be realistic to be achieved - somewhat the same as the "Achievable" bullet point above).
T_ime line or timed (the specific, measured, realistic and agreed target needs to be defined for a given timeline. And apply the SMART thinking for particularly the timeline as well.)
Think about the good advice given above by other colleagues and apply the SMART guideline. And don't forget, a good target is a target if you have to work hard to achieve it (you have to stretch to achieve it), without breaking you. So, yes, target and KPI setting is an art, that requires the same amount of work, hard thinking and due diligence as planning a set of extremely important experiments.
In other words, don't rush, take your time.
By the way: I always thought that KPIs, targets etc should be set by management, and discussed with the employee...
My two cent, as they say.
All the very best, and good luck with your research and KPI setting