My wife and I were talking about this tonight. There are some programs that work and some that don't (and many others that haven't been evaluated). Bullying intervention is her area of research, and I'm a survey methodologist, but we were starting to wonder whether anyone has surveyed educator decisions about bullying program selection, development, and use.
Do educators tend to look for programs that are shown to be affected, or is that less important than other factors (even something as basic as costs or available time in the day)?
Is there a popularity/politics factor (e.g., a program that all the teachers like but has no empirical evidence behind it...I'm thinking of DARE here)?
Any leads to specific surveys or folks doing this specific kind of assessment of the educational practice context of bullying intervention would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!