Constitutive laws addressing concrete durability and phenomena such as shrinkage, creep, AGR and so on very often consider water influence through the introduction of a parameter related with water content (quantity of water embedded within the concrete porous network) or with relative humidity RH). Both can be linked through a sorption or capillary curve, which is rather long to provide, because of long drying time for concrete. On site, direct measurement of these kinds of value are not easy to perform. Some people use TDR probes, others will use "pressure pulse decay" techniques, embedded RH probes or other systems.
I have an open question: from a theoretical point of view, what is the more relevant parameter between water content (related to the total amount of water) and RH (can be linked with capillary pressures) to simulate the role of water in concrete ageing phenomena? My opinion is that it is not obvious to define a internal RH in very small cement paste pores, I would prefer to handle with water content, but it can be discussed. Thanks for your opinion.