03 October 2024 1 7K Report

I am currently working with collaborators in our metabolomics core to replicate the method in Zhang et al, Biochem Pharmacol, 2011 to detect nucleotide pools in infected cells treated with nucleotide analogs like acyclovir. The methods section in this paper uses TCA to precipitate the proteins/etc out of solution and then neutralizes the supernatant with a trioctylamine/trichloro-trifluoro-ethane solution. The paper also implies that the sample is injected directly onto the column in that solution.  The TCA and trioctylamine shouldn’t be a problem, but our collaborators in the metabolomics core are a little wary about the trichloro-trifluoro-ethane.

Previously, the core used an additive called 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP, another fluoro- compound) in their HPLC solvents to help sharpen chromatographic peaks for oligonucleotide analysis.  It worked great; peaks were narrow and easily detected in the negative polarity mode on the mass spectrometer.  However, HFIP was very sticky and contaminated the tubing, injector valves, and inside the mass spec for a long time leading to poor results in subsequent unrelated experiments when running in positive polarity mode. The core needed to completely disassemble their mass spec and HPLC system to remove all of the HFIP residue.

I am wondering if using trichloro-trifluoro-ethane for this assay would cause a similar issue.  Ideally, we would perform the assay as published to avoid any need to tweak/redevelop method prep.  Has anyone detected any similar contamination issues on your instruments following use of trichloro-trifluoro-thane? Alternatively, does anyone have a different method to resolve nucleic acid pools using HPLC/MS?

Thanks for your input everyone!

More Ian Hayman's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions