No.

The number of good, distinct papers someone produces does correlate pretty strongly with their expertise or (a better goal, I think) with the impact a researcher has on their field and on the world. But many of the greatest advances have been made by researchers who are only known for a few very important publications — sometimes only one.

Any idiot can crank out dozens or hundreds of worthless or redundant papers and get them published somewhere, and can even collect a large number of citations, many from friends and co-conspirators. So you can’t just look at the paper count or even the citation count and treat that as a reliable indicator of quality and impact.

See these discussions related to your question:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Petition_Stop_Tracking_Science/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Your_opinion_about_the_following_link/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_do_you_think_about_scientific_production_evaluation_indices_such_as_those_of_Hirsch_h_or_Google_Scholar_i10_or_others/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Research_Publications_Impact_factor_H-Index_I-Index_Is_these_words_becoming_root_cause_for_stress_nowadays_rather_than_Passionate/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_do_bibliometric_studies_get_so_much_attention_in_todays_world_of_academia/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_are_impacts_researchers_can_create_beyond_citations_and_how_to_create_them/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Death_of_impact_factor_system/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_Impact_factor_to_be_avoided_from_journal_metrices_soon/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Impact_Factor_why_did_it_take_so_long_to_bury_this_stupid_variable/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is-there-something-wrong-with-the-impact-factor/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Do_impact_factors_mean_anything_between_subjects/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_significance_of_h-index_to_researchers/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_could_be_a_next_scientific_quality_evaluation_approach/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Better_criteria_of_scoring_index/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/How-can-you-judge-on-an-article-whether-it-is-good-or-not/1

https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_to_quantitatively_assess_the_quality_of_a_peer-reviewed_publication/1

See also this interesting paper with criticism of the current misuse of citation analysis: How scientometry is killing science, https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/24/12/pdf/i1052-5173-24-12-44.pdf