Beam models are the simplest structural models used extensively in design and analysis of aerospace structures. Based on my many years of interaction with hashtag#VABS users, I realized that many are not clear about the inertial and elastic properties of such structures, particularly when such structures are highly anisotropic and heterogeneous. For example, the following typical questions: 1. Do the principal inertial axes change with respect to the beam reference line? How about the principal bending axes, and principal shear axes? 2. Is Euler-Bernouli model applicable when the shear center is not known? 3. How to define the commonly used engineering beam properties such as EA, EI, GJ, tension center, twist center, shear center, etc. for structures with all fundamental deformation modes full coupled? 4. If I have computed properties in one coordinate system, do I have to perform the cross-sectional analysis to obtain the properties in another coordinate system？ 5. Can we still use traditional beam tools developed for isotropic homogeneous materials for composite slender structures? My recent paper on Inertial and Elastic of General Composite Beams (Article Inertial and elastic properties of general composite beams
) laid down the necessary foundation for answering these and many other questions related to beam properties. Yu, W.: “Inertial and Elastic Properties of General Composite Beams,” Composite Structures, Volume 352, 2025, 118690.
The principal inertial axes of a beam are determined by its geometry and mass distribution, and they do not change with respect to the beam’s reference line unless the geometry or mass distribution changes. These axes are oriented such that the product of inertia is zero, and they represent the directions of maximum and minimum moments of inertia.
The principal bending axes are aligned with the directions in which bending occurs independently, meaning bending about one axis does not induce bending about another. For symmetric cross-sections, these axes often coincide with the strong (highest moment of inertia) and weak axes. However, for asymmetric shapes (e.g., L-shaped beams), they may not align with the geometric axes.
The principal shear axes correspond to the directions where shear stress acts without causing torsion. These axes depend on both the cross-sectional shape and material properties but generally coincide with the principal bending axes for symmetric sections
The Euler-Bernoulli beam model can still be applied even if the shear center is not known, as it does not explicitly account for shear deformation or torsion. The theory assumes that plane cross-sections remain plane and perpendicular to the neutral axis during bending, focusing primarily on bending moments and ignoring transverse shear effects. However, if shear deformation or torsional effects are significant (e.g., in short, thick, or asymmetric beams), knowing the shear center becomes critical, and a more advanced model like Timoshenko beam theory would be required
Traditional beam tools developed for isotropic, homogeneous materials can be applied to composite slender structures, but with limitations. Composite materials often have anisotropic properties, meaning their stiffness and strength vary with direction. To address this, techniques like the transformed-section method or the rule of mixtures are used to calculate effective material properties and adapt the analysis to composites.
However, traditional tools may not fully capture complexities such as shear deformation, delamination, or non-uniform stress distributions in composites. Advanced methods like finite element analysis or Timoshenko beam theory are often better suited for accurate modeling of composite beams
- Badges
- Science topic