The Science is a system, because it models the existing world, which can be represented as a system.
On the other hand, particular sciences have to follow the same criteria, and there have to be a relation among them.
Specifically, the mind had to emerge in some point of evolution of life.
Do you know any theory explaining that? Or, do you think it is not the result of an evolution related process, but mind is mostly a matter of creation or something else?
Ken Wilber's integral theory of everything (TOE), especially Integral Psychology provides comprehensive mapping of such questions. See:
Wilber, K. (2000). Integral psychology. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Stephen David Edwards Yes, I remember this book, I think we had before a conversation on it, in a different but related to this question.
R. R. Poznansky
Very interesting (and, I have to say, polemic) your contribution, starting from your comment: The theory puts to rest the century-old dogma about qualia, subject experience, and cognition as the natural oasis of consciousness and that its mechanism relies on quantum information or quantum mechanics.First of all, It's obvious that I need to read in detail all the related argumentation, before making any founded comment, but, and realizing that it will be a priori, I feel it looks like a new step in the direction to the reductionist solution of understanding of mind in general and consciousness particularly (started with the neuroscience based approach)... even in the conceptualization there are a lot of conflicts...
Thank you very much for your contribution.
Article The Nature of Fundamental Consciousness - - - PsyArXiv downl...
Karl Sipfle Thank you very much for your contribution, although particularly I have to recognize that I had before researched your profile and I had put it on the "stack" of resources to be read/analyzed in the near future, and surely it will demand a wider study in order to be understood.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Psychology