LAND SUBSIDENCE
Whether capturing the minute variations in earth’s surface using continuous Global Positioning System; or, Extensometers; or, Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar would justify the spatio-temporal extent of land subsidence resulting from "petroleum" ‘reservoir compaction’?
In case, if we have a rise in groundwater table; or a groundwater recharge that directly leads to ‘soil swelling’ or an ‘uplift’ respectively (right above the petroleum wellsite), won’t the resulting soil behavior in the unsaturated zone lead to a significant subsidence at the surface level?
If so, then, how could we correlate such a land subsidence to be associated with (petroleum) reservoir compaction in the absence of a proper hydrogeological investigation?
Since, there is no actual reduction in piezometric level within the confined reservoir (pay-zone) thickness, whether, is it becoming too difficult to effectively analyze the mechanism of land subsidence associated with a petroleum reservoir (even, if we manage to deduce the data on the changes in reservoir thickness as well as compressibility)?
In case of a petroleum reservoir, whether the distribution of stress at the interface of a seal and the reservoir would follow the simple correlation, where the ‘total vertical stress’ remains equal to the summation of ‘reservoir pore pressure’ and the ‘effective stress’?
How do we ensure whether Terzhagi’s one dimensional consolidation theory (in the vertical direction) would remain highly sufficient; or, should we also consider the Biot’s coefficient taking into account the load transfer (or maximum and minimum horizontal stresses) on the lateral horizontal directions in deducing the changes in reservoir thickness?
Do we have a direct mechanism by which the data on (petroleum) reservoir compaction that would directly get translated into its equivalent land subsidence in the absence of directly measuring the changes in earth’s surface and reporting the land subsidence using InSAR?