We have conducted an extensive look at the literature for research that observes Teams and codes their interactions for indications of Horizontal (including Shared) and Vertical Leadership. While we have found research that utilizes structured interviews and questionnaires for indications of Horizontal and Vertical Leadership on a Team, we have found nothing so far where Teams are observed in person or on videotape and coded for indications of Horizontal and Vertical Leadership.
Does anybody know of such Research?
Or .... Similar research?
Difficulty finding a coding scheme for Horizontal and Vertical Leadership in teams is a common challenge in organizational research and leadership studies. Horizontal leadership refers to the distribution of leadership responsibilities among team members, where authority and decision-making are shared, while vertical leadership involves a more traditional hierarchy with clearly defined leaders.
One of the primary reasons for this difficulty is the dynamic nature of teamwork and the multitude of variables that influence leadership roles. Unlike more straightforward metrics, such as team size or task completion, leadership roles can be fluid and context-dependent. As teams evolve, leadership responsibilities can shift, making it challenging to create a universal coding scheme.
Additionally, leadership in teams is often characterized by a combination of task-oriented and relationship-oriented behaviors. This complexity makes it challenging to develop a coding scheme that accurately captures the nuances of leadership dynamics. Researchers must consider factors like communication patterns, team goals, individual skills, and even team culture to create an effective coding system.
Moreover, context-specific nuances can impact the applicability of a coding scheme. What works for one team or industry may not be suitable for another. Researchers must carefully tailor their coding scheme to the specific requirements of the study at hand, adding another layer of complexity to the process.
the difficulty in finding a coding scheme for Horizontal and Vertical Leadership in teams is a testament to the intricate nature of leadership dynamics within groups. Researchers must navigate this complexity by considering various factors and adapting their approach to the specific context, making it a challenging but essential aspect of understanding effective team leadership.
AI answers just do not answer the question. Think of inductive-deductive coding. A great deal of research had been done on effective teams in business, sports, and academia. For example, Google's research on teams give great insight. My translation is find 4-10 concepts of effective teams from the literature (e.g., active listening, able to be vulnerable, and span of control, etc.) Then also be inductive--look for actions and processes not listed. Think in terms of mixed methods: semistructured interviews or focus groups + observations. Observations are important and need, eventually, a matrix, because what is said and what is done are often completely unrelated.
Here are a few of many possibilities:
Kocolowski, M. D. (2010). Shared leadership: Is it time for a change. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 3(1), 22-32.
Lyndon, S., & Pandey, A. (2020). Shared leadership in entrepreneurial teams: A qualitative study. Journal of Indian Business Research, 12(3), 427-441.
Clarke, N. (2012). Shared leadership in projects: A matter of substance over style. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 18(3/4), 196-209.
Lyndon, S., Pandey, A., & Navare, A. (2020). Shared leadership and team creativity: Investigating the role of cognitive trust and team learning through mixed method approach. Personnel Review, 49(9), 1805-1822.
Binci, D., Cerruti, C., & Braganza, A. (2016). Do vertical and shared leadership need each other in change management?. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(5), 558-578.
Thank you, David. I appreciate that there is no place for AI responses on this platform.Yet:)
I reviewed the article and it is a Lit Review of SL and surrounding theory.I am a Subject Matter guy in Shared Leadership and have studied for many years. You can read my Dissertation Documents if SL interests you.I have it posted as open source. I will keep searching for coding schemes and if I discover I will share them with you.
Best,
Dr.Z
I like coding and have attended a seminar by Saldaña. But. I'd be remiss if I didn't point out diagrammatical thinking (see Grbich) and moving beyond coding can be powerful options.
If you get a chance, read the following:
St. Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 715-719.
[St. Pierre has many other thoughtful articles.]
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematical Sciences
- Statistics
- Statistical Software
- SPSS