01 January 1970 3 569 Report

In intercultural research, Hofstede finds huge intercultural differences, while Schwartz postulates universal similarities. Their models are highly appreciated and working into different directions. But some of the categories they use seem quite related (like Individualism and Hedonism). How could it be, that the one finds cultural universalities while the other one finds culture specific patterns in these related issues? Is it only a matter of the question type (value vs. experiences orientated)?

More Simone Krais's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions