I have just got review and i am missing some points. It will be helpful if anyone please describe me in details.
1. Paper definitely needs a validity section where threats to the results are discussed.
2. what would happen if specific functionality is not implemented (faults of omission)?
And this is my question.
1. Usually while writing research paper we compare result with existing approaches on basis of some criteria. But i have no similar work to compare with so what should i do in evaluation section?
I have no similar work to compare with so what should I do in the evaluation section
Can you tell me the name of first Research article? What were its references?
Who were the first judges?
So at a case, someone has to start the drama.
If you have no related work, you don't need to give it at all. No related works mean there is no Journal yet accept this type of work. Then we need to go to Multidisciplinary Journal.
All the conferences have Referee on all topics but not in a Journal. They will just reject the paper after few months.
What is your Topic? (Quantum Computing / Physics? )
@Kuldip Acharya.... The topic is about Indirect interaction in embedded system.
@peter...thnx for your reply....
Embedded systems consist of several modules and these separated modules exchange resource data by interacting among themselves. As a result, any changes in resources by one module affects the functionality of another module. A resource can be sensor, actuator, file, database etc... It is both theory and practice.
I was thinking about "security aspects" . Its a match. Let me work on that.
any other comment is appreciable.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering