Hi,

I am a novice, first time researcher who started a research project with very little experience in designing questionnaires.

  • My survey consists of 5 parts or sections with each section having an average of 5 questions.
  • Some sections had branching questions so not all respondents would be presented with that section if they did not qualify for it.
  • I also had a qualifying question in the survey, that would kick respondents out if they answered NO to the question which caused my survey pool to reduce from 200 to about 78!
  • All of these design elements really left me with data that was too finely distributed along the 5-point scale - unless I combined the top box score (% responses) the neutral option had the biggest piece (% respondents)...i.e. the neither agree or disagree option is my mode for almost all questions.

To publish the research, is it statistically legitimate for me to consolidate my 5-point into a 3-point, i.e. consider the 2 top box scores on both the agree and disagree ends of the scale, to draw meaningful results from my data? Do you have any other suggestions on how I can about doing my analysis? Thank you!!

I found benefit from this forum and learned from several other threads that most of my survey questions fall into "likert scale data" instead of a "likert type data" see: https://joe.org/joe/2012april/tt2.php

Which means I have to take a different perspective on analyzing this data...

More Sneha Nemichand's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions