@ Charlotte Krawczyk
@ Stefano Tinti
@ Bárbara Ferreira
@ Helen Glaves
You are respected people. How can you trust "experts" who don't read the news on the topic they tell people?
Or are "experts" acting like Gordon Woo from Frontier? He got the article. Of the six experts, 4 approved the article, 2 wrote that they had a conflict of interest and therefore they would not write a conclusion. The editor announced that the article would be published.
But Gordon Woo intervened. And this "pseudo-expert" "Editor-in-Chief" forbade publication, saying that it was too early to publish this article.
Why early? Because he has not yet received money for a competing article in which one of the authors himself. An article about the "usefulness" of a System reports that there is an earthquake. This is a killer system: because of panic, children will die in schools. Gordon Woo is not qualified to be Editor-in-Chief and expert - he used his position to ignore "conflicts of interest".
Forum participants who read the news know that the Method and System of Classic Short-time Earthquake Prediction has been successfully tested and approved by the Expert Council of Russia, which supervises the tests. The technique is supported by Official experts of Israel, Russia, EU, USA...
Those who say that there is no reliable system for classical short-term forecasting either cannot read or are deliberately trying to create more victims by hiding a working system.
All documents and patents are shown here. "UN expert" Garry de la Pomerai clearly explained to everyone that if this method is not applied, then the Sendai program will be impossible to implement. The method has no analogues.
The genesis of earthquakes - theory and practice, is also described and successfully passed the scientific examination of experts from these countries.
And now on the topic of discussion, let's discuss and come to a final decision.
Read the article.
The lives of people, the lives of our children are in danger.
I ask you, gentlemen-scientists, ONCE AND FOR ALL TO VOICE THE AVAILABILITY OF A METHOD AND A SYSTEM WHICH WILL SAVE THEIR LIFE.
Dear Alexandr Alexandr Yagodin ,
Such a question should not be asked of a person who can predict earthquakes. And I know you can predict earthquakes... Because I can also predict earthquakes. For example, in the USA (Alaska is not included) there will not be an earthquake greater than M:5.5... It is even possible that there will not be a 5.1...
I know three places where there might be surprises
I won't tell you because I don't want to break the law...
Just that it applies to this year...
I'll tell you if it worked or not... Example the today earthquake in Philipine is not enough strong:
https://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=1198103
M 5.8 - PHILIPPINE ISLANDS REGION - 2022-12-09 06:33:00 UTC
Regards,
Laszlo
Dear Alexandr Yagodin
Do you see my dear friend, good earthquake forecasting is in the blood of a good earthquake forecaster.
Here is the quick response to your quastion
(attached file:)
'
Regards,
Laszlo
Судя по количеству быстрых ответов, "ученые" зависят от своих академий. Академии наук превратились в Академии сокрытия наук и разделения бюджета между "академиками".
Gentlemen academicians, gentlemen leaders and officials: how many expert opinions do you need to recognize the discovery and the results of work, tests?
Experiment Findings Documents of examinations on the short-term forecast-
Уважаемый (Dear) Alexandr Yagodin ,
You vrote: Russian: "Судя по количеству быстрых ответов, "ученые" зависят от своих академий. Академии наук превратились в Академии сокрытия наук и разделения бюджета между "академиками". [ English (Google translate:); Judging by the number of quick responses, "scholars" depend on their academies. The academies of sciences have turned into academies of hiding sciences and dividing the budget between "academicians".] - Очень хорошо сказано и как верно: [ It's very well worded, and how true: ]
Доверие к работе фрилансеров подрывается фальсификацией информации. [The credibility of the work of our kind of freelancers is undermined by falsifying information.]
С уважением,
Laszlo
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Atmospheric Sciences
- Atmosphere