Sedimentation rates using tube sediment traps only collects sediment falling from above (sediment deposition), but does not account for sediments being suspended at low heights from the bottom, which occurs very frequently and are not trapped by the elevated collector tubes. Also, sediments act producing abrassion on coral through horizontal displacement close to the bottom, and are not fully trapped by collector tubes. Another way of sediemt action is masive sediment horizontal displacement that partially or fully bury or harm corals during storms. For that reason I think that the proposed proxy (percent of number of coral colonies belonging to sediment resitant species) is more representative and integrative of the ways that sediments as whole can damage corals, versus using vertical sediment deposition traps. Additionally, use of sediment traps require very repetitive sampling and thus does not allow to be applied in extensive coral areas. I think that the solution is to use the proxy mentioned in my question. Yes or no? Could this proxy be applied in multivariate analyses, BIOENV of PRIMER, for example?

More Pedro M. Alcolado's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions