According to Einstein the laws of the physics do not depend of the place of observation. We have use this sentence to introduce the notion of small grains mass in the interactions between electron and proton “The quantum state and the doublets” or “Quantum state, the magnetism and the rotation”. Indeed such exchanges allow to have the same law for the attraction from the proton or the electron. In addition this introduce a way for the acceleration. The acceleration is clearly present when we consider the quantification of the space with one ½h quantum for the angular momentum and the other one ½h for the perpendicular direction to the angular motion. As a result it seems that this approach must shed light on the law of gravitation.
Dear Xavier,
What you write about ½h quantum in perpendicular relation with its other ½h quantum for any given EM quantum is in perfect harmony with Maxwell.
So I say yes, since I am convinced that the key to understanding gravitation depends on correctly understanding electromagnetism, which is a conclusion that Einstein himself had reached not long before he passed away.
Best Regards
André
Dear André, thank for your comment. Considering the understanding of the electromagnetism I want recall that the grins mass hypothesis allows a simple explanation of the work of Dirac. We know that Dirac has transformed the Klein Gordon square operator as a product of two linear operators. It is evident that the square operator work for positive or negative charge associated to positive energy or negative energy. With Dirac it has been supposed that one of the linear operator is for the negative charge and the other for the positive. It is surprising that the same operator is use for two different particles. Well, but at this time the variation of the mass giving two flux of matter between the proton and the electron was not considered. In “The symmetry of the motion, the mass and the quantum state”, I explain that: “The hypothesis of exchanges of matter divided into two fluxes of opposite directions brings a simple answer. Indeed each flux is characterized with a direction of the speed of propagation of the grains, they determine the masses active and inert, thus the energy must be considered as positive or negative according to the flux. The classical equation corresponds to the positive flux and the other equation to the negative flux.” Can we consider this approach as a progress in the understanding of the electromagnetism, it is my hope.
Best regards, Xavier
Let me consider the balance between the grains mass of the two fluxes: they concern grains of the both motions: the rotation and the linear one perpendicular to the rotation. To have a motion the some of the grains entering and leaving one motion must be supposed different of zero, positive for one and equal in absolute value for the other but negative, otherwise the motion will not exist.
This explains the angle between the celestial equator plane and the ecliptic plane. Such property is well established in QM, and verified with the measurement of the magnetic moment of several compounds, see for example “Total angular momentum and atomic magnetic moments” with Georges Lochak.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Dosing