Criminals on post-prison supervision are required to fulfill a number of mandates. The mandates are often required by parole boards, parole officers, and the courts.
If I may start by giving you a report from the Swedish system, my answer will be YES. For example in my field, forensic psychiatry, patients are not allowed to drink even though drinking is not a crime and regardless if they are alcohloics or not. Another example is that their negative response to bad things happening to them are seen as much more noteworthy and wrong compared to everyone else.In my World it is a healthy sign to get upset when you are disappointed and I strongly believe that I would find it very strange if one of my friends, say, did not get a loan at the bank and did not react. Or got cancer and just shrugged...
Your question raises many moral issues of how we as humans quite arbitrary decide which demands we have on our self and on othes.
Best regards, Pontus
Thesis Madness as the Foundation of Non-Culpability
I would think yes, as Pontus points out, offenders can have conditions that never apply to nonoffenders, including being required to abstain from alcohol, having curfews, restricted mobility (can only leave home to go to work or required appointments) etc.
yes, from semtence to post custody/supervision largely due to tje myths about them -such as high recidivism to poor ytteatment tesponse. There is also the stigma of beinng a registered sex offender AND a convicted felpn leeps most as pariahs for much of their life. see csom -center for sex offender management. And quinn, forsyth and quinn in deviant behavior.