Observation/data plays a crucial role in any kind of research study, in general and scientific research, in particular. But some people claim that the real skill exists in analysing those data statistically for interpreting the trend of research towards a meaningful conclusion.
What is your precious remark or view in this regard?
The second (procedure of statistical analysis of data) cannot exist without the first [Actual observation (data)]. So, from this perspective, the first is more important than the second.
Regards
The second (procedure of statistical analysis of data) cannot exist without the first [Actual observation (data)]. So, from this perspective, the first is more important than the second.
Regards
As Dr Aristidis Matsoukis mentioned if there are no data or observations then statistical analysis or procedure would be invalid. Therefore both of them are important for the research work with preference for the data
For those hardliners that question the efficacy of observation as a data collecting method, using a multilevel approach like the application of statistical analysis is advocated. These days, triangulating the methods of investigation is a highly legitimate way of escalating the external validity of research.
Both are important, but observation data more important in rank wise.
Statistical analysis can produce credible results if the data/ observations are collected/ recorded properly and honestly.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Esthetics
- Interpretation