According to your experience which characteristics are the most important for a publisher/journal ?
which journal does work accurately and more responsible and you suggest to the other for publishing in your topics?
Very interesting question. Unfortunately most of our country researchers follow only ISI journals according to the policy of our employee but I think as you wrote reliability , responsibility, accuracy and ... are the most important factors for journals, nowadays many journals only work as a business and marketing and not follow the scientific roles.
Very interesting question. Unfortunately most of our country researchers follow only ISI journals according to the policy of our employee but I think as you wrote reliability , responsibility, accuracy and ... are the most important factors for journals, nowadays many journals only work as a business and marketing and not follow the scientific roles.
Yes . I definitely agree with Dr Armaghan Kermanshah , being on time and not want to charge is very important
Hi,
The reputation of the publisher is important, as well as the regularity of appearance of the journal for many years. Today the citations count is important too, and the responsiveness of the editorial staff. The journal's online site should be informative, and provide clear information for those who wish to publish in it.
Publication of a paper can be challenging if you look for a high quality journal. However, the most important points that convince you are;
1. Good reputation worldwide .
2. Ideal revisions.
3. Time of revision is vital as many journals have a slow process.
4. Impact factor
5. Indexed by Thomson Reuters
6. Indexed by Scopus
7. Free of charge.
Some important characteristics for a journal are:
1. A journal should have a well-defined scope that confines the parts of the discipline it deals with. It must be SCI/Scopus indexed.
2. It should take minimum time to review a paper. It must communicate the author about the tentative time for review.
3. Rejection of a paper should be clearly explained and justified. The authors are allowed to argue against the votes of the reviewers.
4. It should not have any charge for publication
5. Lastly a journal must have high impact factor.
Personally I prefer SCI journals (Elsevier, Wiley, Springer, Taylor & Francis publications) that have all the required good characteristics for the publication of a research paper in engineering specialty.
Unfortunately Parisa Ziarati I am hung up with nature and IEEE :)
They are very esteemed and I feel we get good reviews and can learn a lot !!!
Although , for optical we have other such as SPIE /OSA so it depends how your work leans .
You always would want an expert panel for your work to be reviewed and publish at highest level of expertise ...
For me is very important is the used research methodology and results interpretation and discussion.
Best regard,
Ylber Muceku
Not necessary to be ISI /ISC or .... Have academic manner not only think about profit & also good reputation !
In my opinion the optimisation between good reputation i.e. Scopus(SJR) or Thomson Reuters(IF) and the quick puplishing with no routine steps
In my opinion the optimisation between good reputation i.e. Scopus(SJR) or Thomson Reuters(IF) and the quick puplishing with no routine steps
In my opinion the optimisation between good reputation i.e. Scopus(SJR) or Thomson Reuters(IF) and the quick puplishing with no routine steps
In my opinion the optimisation between good reputation i.e. Scopus(SJR) or Thomson Reuters(IF) and the quick puplishing with no routine steps
In my opinion the optimisation between good reputation i.e. Scopus(SJR) or Thomson Reuters(IF) and the quick puplishing with no routine steps
In my opinion the optimisation between good reputation i.e. Scopus(SJR) or Thomson Reuters(IF) and the quick puplishing with no routine steps
In my opinion the optimisation between good reputation i.e. Scopus(SJR) or Thomson Reuters(IF) and the quick puplishing with no routine steps
In my opinion the optimisation between good reputation i.e. Scopus(SJR) or Thomson Reuters(IF) and the quick puplishing with no routine steps
In my opinion the optimisation between good reputation i.e. Scopus(SJR) or Thomson Reuters(IF) and the quick puplishing with no routine steps
Respected professor... Good question first I wish to thank you .....
My opinion regarding my experience first I seen impact factor citation factor of journal and then consider with out publication cost and format structure and quicker response and clearly defined reviewer results......
That's all
Best Thanks
S.Sathishkumar
In ResearchGate First under Publikation article then Klick peered and Control if on the shown list the Journal wanted is listed; then it is ok. Alone it is impossible to get a Publikation in science or nature.
www.sociostudies.org
is the recommended publisher in my field:
open-minded, exact, cooperative.
Integrity, not redundant, generate curiosity in the reader.
Kind regards
Integrity, Response time, Impact factor (IF) and where the journal is indexed.
Characteristics of importance to a publisher:
1. Easy to read manuscript (with explanation of terms and abbreviations)
2. Accurate reporting of data and findings
3. Clearly laid out objectives for the work
4. Clear explanation of methodology/materials
5. Accurate list of references
6. Clear explanation of conclusions and recommendations
Publishers must stick to the ethics of scientific research which are originality, precision and excellence.
Specialized journals (journals dedicated to the specific research field) are important for continued existence of the research field and for deeper discussion within the expert community of the field, but readers are largely limited to experts in the community. The impact factor of such specialized journals may depend on the size and activity of the expert community. Taking my research field (ionizing radiation research) for instance, the impact factor in the specialized journals rarely exceeds 5, and that in most of them ranges between 1 and 3. As such, publications in the journals with higher impact factor (generally with broader coverage of various fields) are also important to attract more general interest to the field and to stimulate discussion in the broader community. In addition to international journals, publications in the local journals (Japanese or Asian for me) are also important for keeping the field active in that area, though readers can be mostly limited to those from the local area. Nevertheless, open access journals (albeit often costly) and SNS like ResearchGate do help increase the number of readers and broaden the coverage of readers.
Easy to read with Clear explanation of abstract and conclusions, very important is where the journal is indexed, how much impact factor and response time.
Global ranking of the journal and impact factor. The cost of the published fee and screening process.
Clarity, integrity and encourage diverse discourse for innovation
In addition to the informations provided by our RG colleagues including
Journals with high impact factor. You can also look into the NCBI which is the National Center for Biotechnology Information through this link
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/guide/literature/
Beside the valuable points mentioned above by RG colleagues, I need to mention that depending on impact factor alone is not enough.
Many journals mention fake impact factor and new researchers publish in such journals with out checking other details related to the journal
For me checking the impact Factor (IF) of the journal from a reliable sources. Also, i agree with Dr. Anuradha Iddagoda on the aspect of clarity and integrity of journal.
1. Editorial Board - must be composed of senior professional researchers from different academic institutions and industry across the globe;
2. Indexation - the journal or publisher must be indexed in reputable, high impact research repository/ data base eg Scopus, ICPC, Thompson Reuters etc
3. Peer Review - the journal must have experienced reviewers for a thourough blind peer review;
4. Visibility - the journal is expected to have open access for readers in order to increase the visibility and citation of authors.
I agree with Avishag Gordon opinion.
With the best wishes
Mr Rezaei Ahvanooei ....
Short answer: A consistency with acceptable hypothesises and interpretations
the production and consolidation of an idea, the definition of partnerships, focus on the reader, the choice of the journal, organization of the paper .
The manuscripts are Peer Reviewed by two, three, or four qualified peers to elevate quality of publication.
Originality, novelty, problem-sharing, solution-making, interesting, concept-building are some of the important characteristics for a publisher/journal.
especially for non mathematic peoples should each mathematical Formula be shown in a picture or geometrical construction, even if the author is not a
Publishers/journals must be dedicated to improving the quality of papers published through rigorous review/editing processes.
Features that are the most important for a publisher / journal are:
1. Quality and objective reviews
2. An acceptable waiting time for publication (eg 3 to 7 months)
3. Do not condition "citing papers in this journal" to raise own rating
4. Acceptable citation base
Chose of a singular title and keep it, more pictures then formulas, more iindividual
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publisher