2) How is the formation of the universe?

The universe, at its most fundamental level, appears to operate according to the principles of quantum mechanics, where uncertainty and indeterminacy play key roles in shaping its evolution. In classical computational theory, Turing’s Halting Problem demonstrates that it is impossible to predict whether a system will reach a final state or run indefinitely. This raises profound questions about the nature of the universe: could it, too, one day halt, reaching a state where no further evolution is possible? However, the inherent unpredictability of quantum mechanics—through phenomena like superposition, quantum fluctuations, and entanglement—may offer a safeguard against such a scenario. This paper explores the intersection of quantum mechanics and the Halting Problem, suggesting that quantum uncertainty prevents the universe from settling into a static, final state. By continuously introducing randomness and variation into the fabric of reality, quantum processes ensure the universe remains in perpetual motion, avoiding a halting condition. We will examine the scientific and philosophical implications of this theory and its potential to reshape our understanding of cosmology.

Stam Nicolis added a reply:

The evolution of the universe, from the inflationary epoch onwards, is described by classical, not quantum, gravity.

Stam Nicolis added a reply:

Turing's halting problem doesn't have anything to do with the subject of cosmology, or any subject, where the equations that describe the evolution of the system under study are known.

In particular the answer to the question of the evolution of the universe is known: It's described by the de Sitter solution to Einstein's equations, that is its expansion is accelerating, although with a very slow rate. The question, whose answer isn't, yet, known is what happened before the inflationary epoch. It is for this question that a new theory is needed, that can match to classical description of spacetime and the quantum description of matter that emerged from it.

Stam Nicolis added a reply:

That quantum mechanics provides a probabilistic description isn't particular to it. Classical mechanics, also provides a probabilistic description, since classical systems are, typically, chaotic and integrable systems are the exception, not the rule. The only difference between a quantum system and its classical limit is the space of states.

Dale Fulton added a reply:

Turing's Halting Problem comes from computer sciences and the study of such systems. The question is whether nature obeys any of our "halting" knowledge and our myopic perspective of the universe. Likely not.

Javad Fardaei added a reply:

Dear Abbas We must realize that our universe is a complete entity that it is running billions of galaxies and place billions solar systems in each galaxy in most accurate way is not result of accident big bang, or run mechanically as our past icons (quantum mechanics, or any mechanical entanglement) stated it. Our universe like anything else (inside of it) has born and it has a natural journey. If you accept this fact, then we are in right track as far as knowing intelligent atom, not mechanical atom.

Unfortunately science believes someone imagination of collapsing our mechanical physics into nature (atom)

Reading this unprecedented articles might help your view of this magnificent universe of ours.

1-Article Universe's Rotation and Its Benefit:

2-Article Intelligent Atom:

Lord James Henderson Mitchell added a reply:

Subject: Invitation to Join Dailyplanet.Club and Response to Your Question on Universe Formation

Dear Abbas Kashani,

I hope you are doing well.

I would like to extend an invitation to you to join us at www.Dailyplanet.Club, a community of innovators, researchers, and forward thinkers exploring the boundaries of science, technology, and sustainability. Your interest in quantum mechanics and the formation of the universe aligns perfectly with our mission, and I believe your contributions would be highly valuable.

Regarding your question about the formation of the universe:

  • The Big Bang theory suggests the universe began as a singularity about 13.8 billion years ago, followed by rapid expansion. Quantum mechanics plays a crucial role in explaining early-universe phenomena, especially during the inflationary period when quantum fluctuations may have given rise to the large-scale structure we see today.
  • Quantum mechanics, with its inherent uncertainty and indeterminacy, governs the behavior of particles at the smallest scales, including the primordial particles in the early universe. This uncertainty may have influenced cosmic evolution, leading to the distribution of matter and energy across the cosmos.
  • Beyond classical understanding, theories like quantum gravity and string theory are being explored to unify general relativity with quantum mechanics, giving us deeper insight into how the universe operates at both cosmic and quantum scales.

That said, I believe that Darwin’s theory, while influential, is not entirely accurate when it comes to understanding the formation of the planet and the universe. We have found some amazing results at Dailyplanet.Club, which present a different perspective, showing how the universe and planetary formation could be viewed through a new, intuitive lens. These findings are only shared with our members, as we are building something transformative—not just a place for research, but a platform that makes a tangible difference by producing real-world innovations in factories, infrastructure, and beyond.

I hope this provides some insight, and I look forward to having you join Dailyplanet.Club, where together we can create something truly remarkable.

Best regards, MJ CEO, Dailyplanet.Club MJHSA Ltd.

More Abbas Kashani's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions