I see that no one follows the rule of mastering the task with exactly two words, saying something. But the task is to characterize with these two words, the type of religion, exactly. I did not ask this question, which is an intellectual challenge. Instead of making any religious denominations of itself, the question is interesting only in that it imposes such a drastic condition on the answer. An appropriate answer is not to confess to being close to any religion, but to say: "This is very difficult to formulate in two words!"
At any case we need "to be", as the auxiliary verb which describes a state; we need also a personal noun. But more isn't allowed, so wie fail. Or we use a verb (then we need a noun - and one can no longer accommodate a characteristic peculiarity). It is a task which needs language sensitivity and linguistic creativity. But some languages can do something that other languages cannot do - and this can be discussed scientifically - without any religious belief. So the task does not require religion, but creatitvity, and which I consider to be very difficult, but which nevertheless represents a challenge. I can understand and appreciate the answer: "It is impossible!"
Of course everyone can still use three or more words, but you can't speak of a challenge anymore - with a scientific claim!!!
The task to solve succeeds - according to my assessment - if one formulates an action in relation to his own religion in the command form, - as a request to action for the believer. But here there are certainly philosophers of language and analysts who can solve the task even better and differently.