While there are advantages to electronic tools (e.g., adaptive testing, using response latencies, human coding errors, and the list goes on), sometimes pencil and paper is still preferred. With some populations there may be difficulty using the electronic devices (and this can affect the fairness of the test, which is now stressed in the standards). There are also problems making sure that everywhere you are using a test has similar connection speeds (and computers crash and run out of power, paper doesn't ... well, I spill coffee, but ...). There are also different security issues with electronic compared with pencil and paper data.  Finally, while there are lots of neat technology enhanced questions showing up on tests (and making sure these render correctly across devices and operating systems is not trivial), some questions may be better suited for pencil and paper. For example, if I were asked to draw a dog, I would rather do it on paper (maybe others would prefer a drawing package, but again that relates to fairness). 

All that said, there are a lot of advantages to using computers, phones, etc., to collect data, but if you have a reason to use pencil and paper journal reviewers should not object.

It depends on context. I worked quite a lot in remote areas in developing countries, where paper has the advantage that it's cheap, light and familiar to both community workers and participants. But it can easily mean that data problems are more frequent (omissions, illogical responses) and cannot be rectified because of the long lag between data collection and data entry

Creo que deberías elegir la versión que esté validada para la muestra que vayas a utilizar. Obviamente si ambas están validadas valoraría las ventajas y limitaciones de cada modalidad en función del contexto en el que vayas a evaluar. Esto permitiría justificar tu elección. Creo que siempre que la versión esté validada y justifiques bien e por qué la has elegido, tu trabajo puede ser publicable siempre que se ajuste a los criterios de rigor científico exigidos en las distintas revistas.