I am against generalization in the subject of scientific research.
The research should be more specific and can not be published without any contribution.
Regards
Dear your question is not clear. However, I would like to that 'Scientific research should not violate the basic principles'.
Generalization and reliability are important criteria in all types of research.The research outcomes which cannot be generalized are specific for a sample but cannot be projected to the rest of the target population. Under such circumstances, the findings attained at the end of the statistical analyses arise doubts about the issue of generalizability. On this basis, generalization is a prerequisite to all types of research. Even in the case of specific experimentations, there is need for estimating the generalizability of the targeted outcomes.
Dear colleagues, I am sorry for the ambiguity in the question. What I mean is that the title of the research is general. From my point of view, the general title of the subject gives the space and freedom to work much more than the title is specific.
Sometimes the title of the research may be "general" for certain reasons, for example, to give the possibility to extend (or to cancel some of) the studied parameters. However, the precise title will be more reflective of the situation under study.
Believe me, even I personally could not understand exactly what your question meant. In order to avoid any ambiguity in the question, I suggest adding a comment attached to your question for further clarification and explanation.
Dr @hamid gadouri thak you, am already add like this comment, i mean the title of the reseach could be general
Depend on the subject of scientific research such as , in mathematics researches the generalization are important.
I am with circular searching for scientific research and interesting integrity.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Microbiology
- Scientific Research