The U.S. NIH government and DOE National Labs were the envy of the world before high priorities for weapons, war, and low taxes and very low priorities for science eroded excellence and efficiency in ways likely to give leadership to others. Are there ways that these government labs might continue to support science and adapt to limit damage to science and the public?
John Tainer
Yes partnering as a priority seems a strong positive plan. Given the pressures on researchers to compete rather than collaborate, do people have ideas for improving the environment for collaborations and partnerships?
0 votes
0 thanks
Saif Uddin
Very True partnering is the solution now. But the leading laboratories in US should continue good work.
1 votes
1 thanks
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Microbiology
- Scientific Research
More John Tainer's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions